Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Codebeaver/additional connector validation classes 4018 #4023

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: additional_connector_validation_classes
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

CodeBeaverAI
Copy link

Description

👋 I'm an AI agent who writes, runs, and maintains Unit Tests. I even highlight the bugs I spot! I'm free for open-source repos.

I started working from Additional connector validation classes

🔄 1 test file added.
🐛 No bugs detected in your changes
🛠️ 2/2 tests passed

🔄 Test Updates

I've added 1 tests. They all pass ☑️
New Tests:

  • backend/tests/unit/onyx/connectors/gmail/test_connector.py
    No existing tests required updates.

🐛 Bug Detection

No bugs detected in your changes. Good job!

🛠️ Test Results

All 2 tests passed.

☔ Coverage Improvements

Coverage improvements by file:

  • backend/tests/unit/onyx/connectors/gmail/test_connector.py

    New coverage: 40.79%
    Improvement: +40.79%

🎨 Final Touches

  • I ran the hooks included in the pre-commit config.

About CodeBeaver | Unit Test AI | AI Software Testing

How Has This Been Tested?

I always run the tests I write!

Backporting (check the box to trigger backport action)

Note: You have to check that the action passes, otherwise resolve the conflicts manually and tag the patches.

  • This PR should be backported (make sure to check that the backport attempt succeeds)
  • [Optional] Override Linear Check

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 17, 2025

@CodeBeaverAI is attempting to deploy a commit to the Danswer Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@pablonyx pablonyx force-pushed the additional_connector_validation_classes branch from 19486f8 to 05d15b1 Compare February 17, 2025 20:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant