Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review of the documentation #105

Open
wants to merge 41 commits into
base: documentation-review
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Review of the documentation #105

wants to merge 41 commits into from

Conversation

c-moeller
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@c-moeller c-moeller self-assigned this Jun 15, 2023
@c-moeller c-moeller requested a review from a team June 15, 2023 14:51
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Show resolved Hide resolved


Before proceeding to the next section, be sure to complete the information requirements for each component and save the energy system.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here I am missing a general word that for specific components as e.g. PV you need an input timeseries. Additional a link to renewables.ninja or something similar would be great as well as that you want to include it in kWp and for example not the solar irradiation values itself, right?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with you this information lacks

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the latest version already online here https://open-plan.rl-institut.de ? Because I cant chose a hydrogen storage to my system

The equation is the following:

.. math::
min Z = \sum_i a_i \cdot CAP_i + \sum_i \sum_t c_{var,i} \cdot E_i(t)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would be great if all the equations are shown in nice formatting, now it is shown in code-writing

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The nice formatting you get it in the compiled read the docs: https://open-plan-documentation--105.org.readthedocs.build/en/105/ (at the bottom of the PR, click on show checks, then on "Details")

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

grafik
unfortunately not :( see screenshot

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, this is fixable in the RTD settings, I will look into it next week, unless it is urgent?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Bachibouzouk please check before merging if this has been fixed

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On my local RTD build of the dev branch, I see the equations correctly, I will make sure we see them online

The components representing battery energy storage systems (BESS) have been defined with one input and one output. The BESS can be connected directly to the electrical bus; please note that the bus is supplied and feeds the battery at the same time.
.. image:: ../images/IMG_example_storage.png
:width: 100%

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image not shown, only code to include it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@NargesChinichian Please check why this image is not implemented

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it just needed a break line. Should be fixed now.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @NargesChinichian did you fix it somewhere? I don't see it. I will insert a break line. You can reject the suggestion if you have fixed it already somewhere else.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am missing the input parameters section in the table of contents

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is because it comes from the MVS documentation. @NargesChinichian can you create a link in the table of contents under Model Reference?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@c-moeller I'm not exactly sure what you mean. Do you mean the table of content on the left side of the main doc page? The parameters we have in the folder are not the correct parameters, we should first have those files updated and then add a link [if I understood Avia's comment correctly].

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not fully remove the "parameters" folder because I thought it's a good structure if we later wanted to add some.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I meant this page: https://open-plan-documentation.readthedocs.io/en/latest/model/input_parameters.html which comes from the MVS documentation but we could also link to in our table of contents (left side of the doc page). But you are right, these are not exactly the ones we use.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you mean with "parameters" folder?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

another nice-to-have would be for each input parameter to which components/project stages (e.g. scenario description) it can be applied (e.g. state-of-charge only for battery storage systems, investment cost for all of the components as well as the whole project)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is possible with information held in the csv, I could implement it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Bachibouzouk I don't know how long this takes. If it only takes 15 minutes, we should implement this. Otherwise let's shift it to the follow-up project

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I you fill the "see_also" column of the "MVS_parameters_list.csv", with the corresponding information (where it is used in the online app, separated by ; if more than one value), then I can easily display this on the docs. The question is how long does this take?


The above constraints apply to the entire system, but not to specific sectors individually.


Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After setting up my scenario, components and constraints clicking on "next" or "simulation" leads to an Server Error (s. screenshots)
OP_ss1
OP_ss2

Copy link
Contributor Author

@c-moeller c-moeller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First review from my side. Will continue tomorrow.

docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

CREATE AN ACCOUNT
^^^^^^^^^^
The first step to start using open_plan is to create an account. To do this, you must click on the "Sign up" button at the top right corner and fill in the following information: your name, email address, username and password. Finally, do not forget to read and accept the privacy statement. You should receive an email with a link to confirm the account creation.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The first step to start using open_plan is to create an account. To do this, you must click on the "Sign up" button at the top right corner and fill in the following information: your name, email address, username and password. Finally, do not forget to read and accept the privacy statement. You should receive an email with a link to confirm the account creation.
The first step to start using open_plan is to create an account. To do this, you must click on the "Sign up" button at the top right corner and fill in the following information: your name, email address, username and password. Finally, do not forget to read and accept the privacy statement. You should receive an email with a link to confirm the account creation. You can find our privacy policy here: xxxx

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add link

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Bachibouzouk please add the link to the privacy policy


**1. Logo. Clicking here will take you back to the home screen.**

**2. Top navigation menu. Located on the upper right part of the screen, here you will find the shortcuts to:**
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Top navigation menu has changed. We need an updated picture.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We still need, right @c-moeller ?

docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/getting_started/quick_start_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is because it comes from the MVS documentation. @NargesChinichian can you create a link in the table of contents under Model Reference?

.. toctree::
:hidden:
:maxdepth: 2
:caption: Use Cases
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@NargesChinichian Could you create an intermediate level with another tab called "Use cases" (which would be on the level where each example is now) and shift the examples to a level below (like "First steps/FAQ" in "Quick start"). Thus we could also include the overall description of the use case side which Catalina prepared.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@c-moeller So as far as I know, the answer is no. The table of content drop-down subtitles is created from the subtitles in a single ".rst" file. When you click on them, like the wikipedia table of content, you just jump to that section on the same page [you are not taken to another page]. I can add all examples together with the meta text Catalina wrote on one page and then the subtitles for each example would work as they work on the "Quick start/ First steps" section drop-down. Would that be more desirable?
There might also be another way of doing this with an intermediate full page but I couldn't find it. Maybe @Bachibouzouk knows something?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not exactly sure what needs to be done here, I will try to clarify it with in person discussion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🔄 In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants