feat: support reflects flag
#193
Merged
+27
−7
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for api-viewer ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
bendera
force-pushed
the
feat/reflects-flag
branch
from
174b47a
to
626b32a
Compare
|
Rebased. Only the relevant changes are visible. |
web-padawan
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Shows whether a property is reflected. It's based on the changes in #190 The important parts are in this commit: 174b47a
I used the
CustomElementFieldinstead of theManifestClassFieldbecause in the latter thereflectsflag is not included. I'm not sure this is the right type but in fact, where I use this type the reflects flag is available. The result looks like this: