Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix] Fix invalid YAMLs in crds #364

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nilroy
Copy link

@nilroy nilroy commented Jan 28, 2025

Pull Request template

Please, go through these steps before you submit a PR.

Why is this PR required? What issue does it fix?:
Fixes invalid YAMLs in crds. Part of this earlier PR
What this PR does?:

Does this PR require any upgrade changes?:

If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::

Any additional information for your reviewer? :
Mention if this PR is part of any design or a continuation of previous PRs

Checklist:

  • Fixes #
  • PR Title follows the convention of <type>(<scope>): <subject>
  • Has the change log section been updated?
  • Commit has unit tests
  • Commit has integration tests
  • (Optional) Are upgrade changes included in this PR? If not, mention the issue/PR to track:
  • (Optional) If documentation changes are required, which issue on https://github.com/openebs/openebs-docs is used to track them:

PLEASE REMOVE BELOW INFORMATION BEFORE SUBMITTING

The PR title message must follow convention:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>.

Where:

  • type is defining if release will be triggering after merging submitted changes, details in CONTRIBUTING.md.
    Most common types are:

    • feat - for new features, not a new feature for build script
    • fix - for bug fixes or improvements, not a fix for build script
    • chore - changes not related to production code
    • docs - changes related to documentation
    • style - formatting, missing semi colons, linting fix etc; no significant production code changes
    • test - adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change
    • refactor - refactoring production code, eg. renaming a variable or function name, there should not be any significant production code changes
  • scope is a single word that best describes where the changes fit.
    Most common scopes are like:

    • data engine (localpv, jiva, cstor)
    • feature (provisioning, backup, restore, exporter)
    • code component (api, webhook, cast, upgrade)
    • test (tests, bdd)
    • chores (version, build, log, travis)
  • subject is a single line brief description of the changes made in the pull request.

@Abhinandan-Purkait
Copy link
Member

Chart lint failure. @nilroy Please check.

@nilroy
Copy link
Author

nilroy commented Jan 30, 2025

Chart lint failure. @nilroy Please check.

@Abhinandan-Purkait @tiagolobocastro I did changed the commit message as I did in others PRs

@Abhinandan-Purkait
Copy link
Member

I guess you need to do the same change as of zfs here as well, on the ct.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.17%. Comparing base (8feeaa0) to head (99d9776).
Report is 81 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #364      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    98.66%   97.17%   -1.49%     
===========================================
  Files            2        2              
  Lines          673      886     +213     
===========================================
+ Hits           664      861     +197     
- Misses           5       18      +13     
- Partials         4        7       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
bddtests 97.17% <ø> (-1.49%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants