Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: use rust stable for linting #68

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

style: use rust stable for linting #68

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

tiagolobocastro
Copy link
Contributor

@tiagolobocastro tiagolobocastro commented Nov 21, 2024

Nightly clippy is no longer required, so we can remove its
requirement and thus simplify the devel rather than require using both
stable and nightly compiler.
Nightly fmt is still required, but since the options we need are still not
stable, I think it's better to drop them for a more mainstream approach.
This should also reduce the target/debug size as there'll be only
builds from one compiler.

@tiagolobocastro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah seems the rust-style (aka rustfmt) still needs the nightly :(

@tiagolobocastro
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think we're loosing much, other than imports_granularity=Crate and since these options are still not stabilized after all this time, probably worth to use the mainstream options, so still keeping this up for review.

@tiagolobocastro tiagolobocastro changed the title build: use rust stable for linting style: use rust stable for linting Nov 22, 2024
Nightly clippy is no longer required, so we can remove its
requirement and thus simplify the devel rather than require using both
stable and nightly compiler.
Nightly fmt is still required, but since the options we need are still not
stable, I think it's better to drop them for a more mainstream approach.
This should also reduce the target/debug size as there'll be only
builds from one compiler.

Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <[email protected]>
@tiagolobocastro tiagolobocastro merged commit 52f4995 into develop Nov 27, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants