-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add access_by_lua(_block/_file) and access_by_lua_no_postpone #217
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
42a195d
to
7b9c916
Compare
f17c4cb
to
eeca371
Compare
1 similar comment
This would also be useful for me since I want to resolve a name to be used in |
1 similar comment
eeca371
to
96c8681
Compare
@arcivanov Got it, I'll look into it. |
@@ -28,13 +28,14 @@ init | |||
|
|||
|
|||
=== TEST 2: get_phase in access_by_lua | |||
TODO | |||
--- SKIP | |||
--- stream_server_config | |||
access_by_lua_block { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add a test that using both preread and access phases?
Does the access phase have the limitation below in the preread phase?
However, keep in mind that calling the receive() method of the request socket will consume the data from the buffer and such consumed data will not be seen by handlers further down the chain.
Some rudimentary tests Requested cleanup of `#if 1` Try fixing tests
35e4088
to
0e2e7b3
Compare
Some rudimentary tests