Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] Fix array hashCode calculation in ResyncReplicationRequest (#16378) #16389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

dbwiddis
Copy link
Member

Backport 0f7d572 from #16378

…h-project#16378)

* Array, passed to Objects.hash(), should be wrapped into Arrays.hashCode(). Added unit test

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kryukov <[email protected]>

* Updated CHANGELOG.md

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kryukov <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kryukov <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 7c4c8ec: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.76%. Comparing base (3ef3455) to head (7c4c8ec).
Report is 8 commits behind head on 2.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x   #16389      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     71.78%   71.76%   -0.02%     
- Complexity    65079    65096      +17     
============================================
  Files          5305     5305              
  Lines        304146   304146              
  Branches      44232    44232              
============================================
- Hits         218317   218268      -49     
- Misses        67648    67706      +58     
+ Partials      18181    18172       -9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dblock dblock merged commit 41d582e into opensearch-project:2.x Oct 21, 2024
39 checks passed
@dbwiddis dbwiddis deleted the backport-16378-to-2.x branch October 22, 2024 03:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants