Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds the listener for resource utilization metrics #687
Adds the listener for resource utilization metrics #687
Changes from 6 commits
d7d5660
aad2bfd
cf42943
1cb5c43
b137a47
6899623
34ebcc4
590ba5d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check warning on line 307 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/PerformanceAnalyzerPlugin.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/PerformanceAnalyzerPlugin.java#L307
Check warning on line 310 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/PerformanceAnalyzerPlugin.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/PerformanceAnalyzerPlugin.java#L310
Check warning on line 393 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/config/PerformanceAnalyzerController.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/config/PerformanceAnalyzerController.java#L393
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the registry is null it does not make sense to create this listener, Do we need to throw exception instead of returning null?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No. We just want to stay silent.
Check warning on line 69 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L68-L69
Check warning on line 82 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L81-L82
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isSearchListenerEnabled
seems to be a mandatory method for any SearchListeners implementation. Should we add it to the super class and all the subclasses needs to write the logic of this method.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can do that. Didn't want to change a lot the existing stuff as anyways the plan is to bring this into core at some point in time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we throwing only
OPENSEARCH_REQUEST_INTERCEPTOR_ERROR
from all the Phases?Is this correct or do we need to throw different exceptions from different Phases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just to add a stat that there is some issue with the interceptor.
Check warning on line 116 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L111-L116
Check warning on line 126 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L121-L126
Check warning on line 136 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L131-L136
Check warning on line 146 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L141-L146
Check warning on line 156 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L151-L156
Check warning on line 166 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L161-L166
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the practice that is being followed for any Id that is being fetcher from threadLocal. Is it 0 by default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handling null would be very tricky.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can use -1 instead of 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we call these as SearchOperationStartTime and PhaseTookTime.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is common method for fetch and search,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As these are being used in the context of search we can change operations to phase and change variable names.
Check warning on line 308 in src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/main/java/org/opensearch/performanceanalyzer/listener/RTFPerformanceAnalyzerSearchListener.java#L307-L308
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add a javadoc explaining what are we trying to calculate and what exactly this method provides.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added it from where this is being called.