Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-ocm-2.7] Update default tag for index and service #2018

Merged

Conversation

adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor

@adriengentil adriengentil commented Jan 30, 2023

e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6, e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node and e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-unbinding-single-node jobs are currently permafailing.

I suspect it's because the index not being aligned with branch version.

@adriengentil adriengentil changed the base branch from master to release-ocm-2.7 January 30, 2023 12:39
@adriengentil adriengentil changed the title release ocm 2.7 [release-ocm-2.7] Update default tag for index and service Jan 30, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 30, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from omertuc and osherdp January 30, 2023 12:40
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 30, 2023
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ CONTAINER_RUNTIME_COMMAND := $(or ${CONTAINER_COMMAND}, ${CONTAINER_RUNTIME_COMM
LINT_CODE_STYLING_DIRS := src/tests src/triggers src/assisted_test_infra/test_infra src/assisted_test_infra/download_logs src/service_client src/consts src/virsh_cleanup src/cli

# assisted-service
SERVICE := $(or $(SERVICE), quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-service:latest)
SERVICE := $(or $(SERVICE), quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-service:ocm-2.7)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we can make some adjustments that don't demand us to handle all those tag changes for the branches
I mean, if anything I would assume we override SERVICE somewhere to use the right service image, and not use the default. Is it not the case?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right, I'll see if I can do it from release repo

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and yes SERVICE shouldn't be required

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you know what, maybe this change is good for easing local testing of this version

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2023

@adriengentil: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-net-suite
  • /test images
  • /test lint

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv4
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ipxe
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-unbinding-single-node
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-reclaim
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-reclaim-single-node
  • /test e2e-vsphere-assisted-kube-api

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node
looks like prow is flaky today...

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2023

@adriengentil: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-net-suite
  • /test images
  • /test lint

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv4
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ipxe
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-unbinding-single-node
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-reclaim
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-reclaim-single-node
  • /test e2e-vsphere-assisted-kube-api

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node
looks like prow is flaky today...

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
/test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-unbinding-single-node

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

@osherdp @eliorerz e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6 seems broken:

# kubectl get agentclusterinstall/test-infra-cluster-f883c57c-agent-cluster-install -n assisted-spoke-cluster-fd412a8f -o yaml
apiVersion: extensions.hive.openshift.io/v1beta1
kind: AgentClusterInstall
spec:
  apiVIP: 1001:db9::64
  ingressVIP: 1001:db9::65
  networking:
    clusterNetwork:
    - cidr: 172.30.0.0/16
      hostPrefix: 23
    serviceNetwork:
    - 10.128.0.0/14
status:
  apiVIP: 1001:db9::64
  apiVIPs:
  - 1001:db9::64
  ingressVIP: 1001:db9::65
  ingressVIPs:
  - 1001:db9::65
  machineNetwork:
  - cidr: 1001:db9::/120
  validationsInfo:
    network:
    - id: networks-same-address-families
      message: Address families of networks (MachineNetworks, ServiceNetworks, ClusterNetworks)
        are not the same.
      status: failure

it seems we provide IPv4 addresses to the configuration and as a consequence, the validation fails because we mix IPv4/6. Does it ring a bell to you?

@osherdp
Copy link
Contributor

osherdp commented Jan 30, 2023

it seems we provide IPv4 addresses to the configuration and as a consequence, the validation fails because we mix IPv4/6. Does it ring a bell to you?

I think (but really not sure anymore) that we're missing an override_cluster_configuration to set the required subnets in the ipv6 case. those two subnets for pods and services are given as input by the user, in oppose to the machine-network that is an "input" from the environment AFAIK

I am not sure how it happened though, maybe something we changed by mistake? Those jobs usually get less importance and treatment as the ztp ones are more comprehensive and simulate the use-case in a better way

You can open a bug on it, @eliorerz can probably debug it pretty quickly if needed

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
I'll open a bug for it

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2023

@adriengentil: Overrode contexts on behalf of adriengentil: ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
I'll open a bug for it

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
/test ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-assisted-kube-api

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2023

@adriengentil: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-binding-single-node
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-net-suite
  • /test images
  • /test lint

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv4
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-ipxe
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-late-unbinding-single-node
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-reclaim
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted-kube-api-reclaim-single-node
  • /test e2e-vsphere-assisted-kube-api

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
/test ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-assisted-kube-api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2023

@adriengentil: Overrode contexts on behalf of adriengentil: ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6
/test ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-assisted-kube-api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere-assisted-kube-api

1 similar comment
@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere-assisted-kube-api

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor Author

@osherdp let's merge it?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 31, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adriengentil, osherdp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [adriengentil,osherdp]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2023

@adriengentil: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6 68c37df link false /test e2e-metal-assisted-ha-kube-api-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0b1e9dc into openshift:release-ocm-2.7 Jan 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants