OCPBUGS-44514: Bump k8s api to 1.28.15

[jerpeter1]

Bump kubernetes version to 1.28.15
/cc @bertinatto

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jerpeter1: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44514, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.15.z" version, but no target version was set
• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44513 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is New instead
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44513 to target a version in 4.16.0, 4.16.z, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bump kubernetes version to 1.28.15
/cc @bertinatto

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jerpeter1: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 0c2923b|UPSTREAM: : hack/update-vendor.sh, make update and update image: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 30993e2|Merge pull request #127963 from SataQiu/automated-cherry-pick-of-#127650-upstream-release-1.28: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 3ceaf84|Merge pull request #127605 from haitch/haitao/k128-on-go122p7: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 4664a82|Merge tag 'v1.28.15' into bump-1.28.15: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 48209d5|kubeadm: check the member list status before adding or removing an etcd member: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 53a5c34|Fix daemonset to ensure old unhealthy pods are counted towards max unavailable budget.: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 5561311|Merge pull request #127674 from mas9612/automated-cherry-pick-of-#125502-upstream-release-1.28: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 6226e65|bugfix: endpoints controller track resource version conrrectly: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 722fcef|kubeadm: check whether the peer URL for the added etcd member already exists when the MemberAddAsLearner/MemberAdd fails: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 77e71b8|add cross image as well: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 7ac76f7|Merge pull request #127416 from saschagrunert/automated-cherry-pick-of-#127151-base-release-1.28: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 8418565|Release commit for Kubernetes v1.28.15: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 8fa14d5|bump go to 1.22.7: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 91ed5da|Update CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.28.md for v1.28.14: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 926feda|Merge pull request #127776 from Snowflake-Labs/automated-cherry-pick-of-#123233-upstream-release-1.28: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 95ddbb9|Merge pull request #128129 from haitch/haitao/k128-on-go122p8: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• aafc035|Remove socat and ebtables from kubeadm preflight checks: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• ab540af|fix pod index label name: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• b450f18|kubeadm: fix a bug where the RemoveMember function did not return the correct member list when the member to be removed did not exist: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• f07e313|Merge pull request #127622 from SataQiu/automated-cherry-pick-of-#127491-upstream-release-1.28-1727265482: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• f1a5de9|Merge pull request #127454 from swetharepakula/automated-cherry-pick-of-#127417-origin-release-1.28: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• f6a2011|bump golang to 1.22.8: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jerpeter1

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [jerpeter1]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@jerpeter1: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade	0c2923b	link	true	/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade	0c2923b	link	true	/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade	0c2923b	link	true	/test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.