-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Verify RGW VIP is properly configured #2408
Verify RGW VIP is properly configured #2408
Conversation
Thanks for the PR! ❤️ |
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/76717cecb8e245dea8953fb48d8194a2 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 13m 33s |
0229c78
to
8a1d8b2
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/bb58bf67370c440aacd8b01fd67ea641 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 33m 18s |
|
0af7520
to
caf5dfc
Compare
cd3b06d
to
e84c11b
Compare
81363dd
to
d422a86
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/d10aa796fb6548d8a1675de2f6e0897b ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 16m 18s |
6d06445
to
8686840
Compare
Want to rebase on #2418 ? |
rebased |
We had an issue related to the rgw_vip configuration. This patch removes the cidr usage from the facts and passes it to the rgw ingress template. In addition, ipaddr filter is used to properly get the ipaddress and fail if malformed (or is just not what we expect).
/trigger github-experimental |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm +2 to merge this.
Let's just make sure the github-experimental check passes first.
The testproject passed |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pablintino The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
ed82055
into
openstack-k8s-operators:main
Should we cherry pick this to the next release? |
Makes sense to me. |
/cherrypick 18.0.0-proposed |
@fmount: new pull request created: #2421 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
No description provided.