Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed #2240 secondary ext-jwt processing would fail... #2242

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

andrewpmartinez
Copy link
Member

...if ext-jwt primary wasn't enabled.

  • fixes extra JWT processing on authentication endpoints (that would never pass)
  • updates error message for missing NamedIndexStore implementations
  • fixes ext-jwt store error stating that a named index is not present

...if ext-jwt primary wasn't enabled.

- fixes extra JWT processing on authentication endpoints (that would
  never pass)
- updates error message for missing NamedIndexStore implementations
- fixes ext-jwt store error stating that a named index is not present
@andrewpmartinez andrewpmartinez requested review from a team as code owners July 16, 2024 17:52
- verify up to a max number of jwts (hard coded at 2)
- verify by batching and output logging values on failure
@andrewpmartinez
Copy link
Member Author

Added bulk processing for primary plus secondary JWT processing (if configured)

Copy link
Member

@dovholuknf dovholuknf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

string literals should be constants imo

@andrewpmartinez andrewpmartinez merged commit 4f3f4d2 into release-next Jul 18, 2024
17 checks passed
@andrewpmartinez andrewpmartinez deleted the fix.2240.fix.secondary.ext.jwt branch July 18, 2024 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants