-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Search data attribute in parent elements #4
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Search data attribute in parent elements #4
Conversation
I can't run linting. Blocked by issue #5 |
@fmoliveira Hi, I am very much looking for your PR to be merged and available in the extension. Is there any way I could help? |
@wolfi3b Sure thing! Thanks for coming in! This PR is currently blocked because I can't tick all the checklist in the Pull Request Template. It has a lot of linting errors, but all those errors also happen on master! I'm wondering if I just have issues with my setup, or if we actually have those lint errors to solve. I've opened an issue at #5 Could you please checkout the repository in the If that issue is confirmed, then we can work on getting the linting issues fixed, and unblock the PR checklist. :) |
No problem. So I run it and got ton of lint errors as well so I would say something is not right here. Maybe author forgot to commit something. |
Well if I run it with --fix than only 40 remains :-) |
@wolfi3b Awesome!! I haven't tried the auto fix, very good to hear that!! Would you open a PR with these fixes? I can help you fixing the remaining ones if you'd like. :) |
@oscartavarez Could you please confirm if the linting settings are properly committed to the repository? Do you have the same errors on your environment as well, or may the repository be missing a file with your linting settings? |
@fmoliveira Well the thing is ..I don't know if I should. I mean for all I know the issues are here because the author forgot to commit linting settings. It would be strange he did not run lint on his code. But correct me if I am wrong he does need to confirm the PR am I right? So we still need him to check our comments. |
@wolfi3b Yeah, you're right! I thought about the settings afterwards! I've pinged @oscartavarez in the linting issue at #5 as well, which is shorter, let's wait for an answer - as you've said, he will have to confirm the PR anyway before we can merge this fix. 🙃 |
@fmoliveira hmmm...do you know if it is possible to check somewhere if anyone else than @oscartavarez has write access to confirm PR's? I mean...his last activity is more than 2 months ago (if I did not miss anything) suggesting he is pretty busy and may not have the time or opportunity to check here anytime soon. |
@wolfi3b We can see the list of contributors, but I think it's not possible to see list of maintainers. @tnolet Do you think you could help us? We would like to confirm whether the repository is missing the proper lint settings (because it has hundreds of lint errors), and afterwards, we would want to get a couple of pull requests reviewed and merged (they are both blocked by the lint issue). |
@fmoliveira was not aware of this "fork" of Puppeteer Recorder. Cool! |
@tnolet Sweet, I wasn't aware of the Puppeteer Recorder either, I will definitely have a look on it! Since this repo is not tagged as a fork (probably it was cloned and pushed instead), I imagined you were an an early member of this project. Thanks for your answer! 😃 |
That is strange ...I had a quick look and the config files looks pretty the same with the pupeteer repo. So is it possible the author of this "fork" just did not run lint? |
@wolfi3b Yes, I don't doubt that! The CONTRIBUTING.md and PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md only had the word Pupeeteer replaced for Cypress and it's all the same. |
Hey guys, just check the Puppeteer Recorder Travis build. https://travis-ci.org/checkly/puppeteer-recorder It's green and runs |
@tnolet Nice, I'll take a look! Thanks!! 🙌 |
@fmoliveira hi, I just got back...any luck/update? |
Hi @wolfi3b ! No news! But given this repository is a fork from puppeteer-recorder and the former has the same PR template, but there are lots of lint errors here, I believe linting wasn't really taken into account on this repository. We could either fix everything or just forget it and merge anyway. In any case, we need your help @oscartavarez ! Could you please take a look here or at least add some of us as maintainers and publishers so we could keep improving this tool? Thanks a lot, mate! |
Sorry guys for the delay, this weekend i will take a look at it. really sorry guys @fmoliveira @wolfi3b. |
@oscartavarez No problem man! Happy to see you around! 😃 |
@oscartavarez Glad you are back! If you don't have time I agree with @fmoliveira. It would be great if you could make some of us maintainers so we can help you not having to handle everything yourself. |
@oscartavarez Hi did you have any time to check it out? Or if you could make one of us able to approve we would very much appreciate it. |
Pull Request Template
Fixes issue #1 .
Description
I will add more details soon.
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
I've used breakpoints while running the unpacked extension, as well as successfully recorded a lot of tests with the proper data attributes.
I'll try to add a unit test to cover this and will update this PR soon.
Checklist:
npm run lint
passes with no errors.npm run test
passes with no errors.