Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependencies and versions #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2024
Merged

Update dependencies and versions #28

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2024

Conversation

brettcurtis
Copy link
Contributor

@brettcurtis brettcurtis commented Dec 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new entry to ignore Checkov directories in the version control system.
    • Introduced a new argument for the Checkov hook configuration.
  • Updates

    • Upgraded Google provider versions in multiple README files.
    • Updated Helm and Kubernetes provider versions in the regional README.
    • Changed the default value for the Istio version variable.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced README files with badges for CI/CD processes and minor formatting adjustments.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis self-assigned this Dec 21, 2024
Copy link

infracost bot commented Dec 21, 2024

💰 Infracost report

Monthly estimate generated

Estimate details (includes details of unsupported resources)
──────────────────────────────────
2 projects have no cost estimate changes.
Run the following command to see their breakdown: infracost breakdown --path=/path/to/code

──────────────────────────────────
7 cloud resources were detected:
∙ 4 were estimated
∙ 2 were free
∙ 1 is not supported yet, see https://infracost.io/requested-resources:
  ∙ 1 x google_compute_security_policy
This comment will be updated when code changes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request encompasses updates across multiple files in a Kubernetes-Istio Terraform module. The changes primarily involve version updates for providers and configurations, including Checkov, Google, Helm, and Kubernetes providers. The .gitignore file was updated to include additional ignored directories, the .pre-commit-config.yaml was modified to update the Checkov version and add a new argument, and various README files were updated with new provider versions. The Istio version default was also updated from 1.24.0 to 1.24.2.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gitignore Added .external_modules to ignored entries
.pre-commit-config.yaml Updated Checkov repository version from 3.2.296 to 3.2.343, added --download-external-modules=true argument
README.md Updated Google provider versions from 6.11.1 to 6.14.1
regional/README.md Updated provider versions: Google (6.11.1 → 6.14.1), Helm (2.16.1 → 2.17.0), Kubernetes (2.33.0 → 2.35.1); Updated Istio version default to 1.24.2
regional/manifests/README.md Updated Kubernetes provider version from 2.33.0 to 2.35.1
regional/variables.tf Changed Istio version default from 1.24.0 to 1.24.2

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

  • osinfra-sa

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30eaad4 and 922a933.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • regional/README.md (2 hunks)
  • regional/manifests/README.md (1 hunks)
  • regional/variables.tf (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • regional/variables.tf
  • .gitignore
  • regional/README.md
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.pre-commit-config.yaml (2)

37-37: Security consideration: External module downloads enabled

The new argument --download-external-modules=true allows Checkov to download external modules during scanning. While this enables more comprehensive security checks, it introduces potential security risks:

  1. External code execution during CI/CD
  2. Potential for supply chain attacks
  3. Increased build times and network usage

Consider:

  • Documenting this change in the README
  • Adding a comment explaining why this flag is necessary
  • Implementing a allow-list for trusted module sources

32-32: Verify Checkov version update compatibility

The version update from 3.2.296 to 3.2.343 seems reasonable, but let's verify the changelog for any breaking changes.

regional/manifests/README.md (1)

12-12: Verify Kubernetes provider version compatibility

The update from 2.33.0 to 2.35.1 aligns with the PR objectives. However, let's verify there are no breaking changes that could affect existing resources.

✅ Verification successful

Version update from 2.33.0 to 2.35.1 is safe to proceed

Based on the changelog analysis between versions 2.33.0 and 2.35.1:

  • All changes are backwards compatible, consisting of bug fixes, enhancements, and new features
  • Notable bug fixes in 2.35.1 address issues with Jobs and DaemonSets
  • No breaking changes or deprecations were introduced
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the Kubernetes provider changelog between versions

# Get the changelog from GitHub
gh api repos/hashicorp/terraform-provider-kubernetes/releases \
  --jq '.[] | select(.tag_name | test("v2.3[3-5]")) | {version: .tag_name, body: .body}' \
  | jq -r '.version + "\n" + .body + "\n"'

Length of output: 2983

README.md (2)

76-77: Verify Google provider version compatibility

The updates from 6.11.1 to 6.14.1 for both Google providers align with the PR objectives. Let's verify there are no breaking changes that could affect existing resources.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the changelog analysis between versions 6.11.1 and 6.14.1, I can generate the final response:

Provider version update appears safe to proceed

The version updates from 6.11.1 to 6.14.1 for both google and google-beta providers contain:

  • No breaking changes
  • Only bug fixes, improvements, and new features
  • Notable bug fixes include:
    • Fixed firewall policy rule state management
    • Fixed several permadiff issues
    • Fixed update-related bugs in various resources

The versions are synchronized between google and google-beta providers, maintaining compatibility.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the Google provider changelog between versions

# Get the changelog for google provider
echo "Google Provider Changelog:"
gh api repos/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google/releases \
  --jq '.[] | select(.tag_name | test("v6.1[1-4]")) | {version: .tag_name, body: .body}' \
  | jq -r '.version + "\n" + .body + "\n"'

echo "Google Beta Provider Changelog:"
gh api repos/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google-beta/releases \
  --jq '.[] | select(.tag_name | test("v6.1[1-4]")) | {version: .tag_name, body: .body}' \
  | jq -r '.version + "\n" + .body + "\n"'

Length of output: 49166


76-77: Verify completeness of version updates

Let's ensure all relevant version-related files have been updated consistently.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about version constraints in the codebase.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Version updates are consistent across the codebase

The version updates in README.md (6.14.1 for both google and google-beta providers) are complete, and no inconsistencies were found. The codebase follows a flexible version constraint approach where:

  • Provider versions are declared in README.md for documentation
  • Test fixtures and actual provider configurations use source declarations without pinned versions
  • Other version references in the codebase are for different components (Istio, WAF rules) and are unrelated to the Google provider versions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any missed version updates in other files

# Search for version references in Terraform files
echo "Searching for provider version references:"
rg -g '*.tf' -g '*.hcl' -g '*.md' "provider\s+\"(google|kubernetes)" -A 2

# Search for version constraints in provider configurations
echo "Searching for version constraints:"
rg -g '*.tf' -g '*.hcl' "required_providers" -A 5

Length of output: 1282


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for specific version constraints in terraform files
echo "Searching for version numbers in terraform files:"
rg -g '*.tf' -g '*.hcl' 'version\s*=|~>|\d+\.\d+\.\d+' -B 2 -A 2

# Check versions.tf files specifically
echo -e "\nChecking versions.tf files:"
fd 'versions.tf' --exec cat {}

Length of output: 1972


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis merged commit b22ad44 into main Dec 21, 2024
5 checks passed
@brettcurtis brettcurtis deleted the deps branch December 21, 2024 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant