Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support for ostree systems #58

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

richm
Copy link
Contributor

@richm richm commented Nov 27, 2023

Feature: Allow running and testing the role with ostree managed nodes.

Reason: We have users who want to use the role to manage ostree
systems.

Result: Users can use the role to manage ostree managed nodes.

Add dependency on ansible.posix which provides the rhel_rpm_ostree
package manager.

When using the package: module, add use: to force the use of
the ostree package manager on ostree systems, and omit if not.

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson [email protected]

Feature: Allow running and testing the role with ostree managed nodes.

Reason: We have users who want to use the role to manage ostree
systems.

Result: Users can use the role to manage ostree managed nodes.

Add dependency on `ansible.posix` which provides the `rhel_rpm_ostree`
package manager.

When using the `package:` module, add `use:` to force the use of
the ostree package manager on ostree systems, and `omit` if not.

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <[email protected]>
@richm richm requested a review from natoscott November 27, 2023 15:30
Copy link
Member

@natoscott natoscott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @richm ... bit 'ugly', but seems to be the only way.

@natoscott
Copy link
Member

Merged.

@natoscott natoscott closed this Nov 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants