UI: Edit workflow execution

[deepsidhu85]

What does this PR do and why?

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why.

This PR adds in the UI functionality to allow a submitter of a personal workflow execution to update the name of the workflow execution post launch, as well as, allows a user with access level ANALYST or higher to update the name of an automatically launched workflow execution post launch

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other pull requests.

Automated workflow execution:

Personal workflow execution:

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

Test this out with a personal workflow execution (non-automated workflow execution launched from within a project) and with an automated workflow execution

Personal Workflow Execution:

1. Create a project, a sample, and upload a paired-end dataset to the sample
2. From the project -> samples page, select this sample and launch a pipeline (do not set a name)
3. From the Workflow Executions page in the context of Your Work, click on the ID of the workflow execution which was just launched
4. Verify there is no description list item for Name
5. Click on the Edit button on the top right
6. Add a new name and click Submit
7. Verify that the name in the header is updated and that there is now a description list item for Name with the value you set the workflow execution name to
8. Click Edit again, clear the name in the modal, and click Submit
9. Verify the header has been updated to the workflow_execution -> metadata -> workflow_name and there is no longer a description list item for Name

Automated Workflow Execution

1. Within the project above, setup an automated workflow execution from it's settings
2. Add another member to this project with the access level ANALYST
3. Add a new sample to the project, and upload a paired-end data set
4. From the Workflow Executions page within the context of the project, click on the id of the latest launched workflow execution
5. Follow steps 5 through 9 above (for the personal workflow execution), omitting verifying that the workflow execution name in the header as we display the id for an automated workflow execution
6. Logout and login as the other member that you added whose access level is ANALYST
7. Follow steps 5 through 9 above (for the personal workflow execution), omitting verifying that the workflow execution name in the header as we display the id for an automated workflow execution

PR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the PR acceptance checklist for this PR.

[joshsadam]

Just a couple UI changs.  Feel free to chat with me about the dialogs.  I still need to go through your tests.

[joshsadam]

Just one thing I see on the tests

[github-actions]

Code Metrics Report

Coverage	Test Execution Time
92.9%	9m58s

Code coverage of files in pull request scope (96.0%)

Files	Coverage
app/components/workflow_executions/table_component.html.erb	100.0%
app/controllers/concerns/workflow_execution_actions.rb	86.9%
app/policies/workflow_execution_policy.rb	100.0%
app/views/projects/workflow_executions/_edit_dialog.html.erb	100.0%
app/views/projects/workflow_executions/_summary.html.erb	100.0%
app/views/projects/workflow_executions/_table.html.erb	100.0%
app/views/projects/workflow_executions/edit.turbo_stream.erb	100.0%
app/views/projects/workflow_executions/show.html.erb	100.0%
app/views/projects/workflow_executions/update.turbo_stream.erb	83.3%
app/views/workflow_executions/_edit_dialog.html.erb	100.0%
app/views/workflow_executions/_summary.html.erb	100.0%
app/views/workflow_executions/_table.html.erb	100.0%
app/views/workflow_executions/edit.turbo_stream.erb	100.0%
app/views/workflow_executions/show.html.erb	100.0%
app/views/workflow_executions/update.turbo_stream.erb	82.3%

---

Reported by octocov

[ericenns]

Looks good to me!