fix: ?property formula (part 2), complete deduction #208
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Preview at https://pr208.topology.pages.dev/ |
|
Better. Related to the implication [ LOTS + Perfectly normal => First countable ]: (1) π-Base, Search for returns "... is impossible". As discussed before, it's not immediately clear what is impossible, but the users just have to replace "?P" with "P" and "~P" and they will be told which one of the two is impossible. (2) π-Base, Search for It should be "... is impossible", but for some reason that is not detected. Probably due to the limitations of the deduction engine, as you mentioned. |
|
e2e tests are just broken, so ignoring that. This is a strict improvement, so merging. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Continuation of #206.
See #206 (comment) for details.