Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revert "feat(python): Expose 'strict' argument to 'is_in'" #17792

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Revert "feat(python): Expose 'strict' argument to 'is_in'" #17792

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

ritchie46
Copy link
Member

Reverts #17776

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit 0e775bb into main Jul 23, 2024
13 of 15 checks passed
@ritchie46 ritchie46 deleted the revert-17776-is_in branch July 23, 2024 06:20
atigbadr pushed a commit to atigbadr/polars that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2024
@ritchie46 @atigbadr
Revert "feat(python): Expose 'strict' argument to 'is_in'" (pola-rs#1…
7ecbad2 
…7792)
@c-peters c-peters added the accepted Ready for implementation label Jul 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@c-peters c-peters Awaiting requested review from c-peters c-peters is a code owner

@alexander-beedie alexander-beedie Awaiting requested review from alexander-beedie alexander-beedie is a code owner

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli Awaiting requested review from MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli is a code owner

@reswqa reswqa Awaiting requested review from reswqa reswqa is a code owner

Assignees

@ritchie46 ritchie46

Labels
accepted Ready for implementation title needs formatting
Projects
Backlog
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ritchie46 @c-peters