Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Tan phi generator extension #3146

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[WIP] Tan phi generator extension #3146

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

So-Fras
Copy link
Member

@So-Fras So-Fras commented Sep 17, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

/**
* @author Sophie Frasnedo {@literal <sophie.frasnedo at rte-france.com>}
*/
public interface GeneratorTanPhi extends Extension<Generator> {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@So-Fras are we sure tan phi is the correct and usual word in english ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not at all! I don't like that name either and I hope to find a better alternative.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CIM defines cim:RegulatingControlModeKind.powerFactor, I would suggest GeneratorPowerFactorRegulation.

but beware that powerFactor is cosPhi, not tanPhi

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So there is no standard term for tanPhi? Any if modelling using cos phi instead of tan phi is the standard way we should also use it, this is equivalent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants