Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

shuffle if/else for faster property complexity analysis #417

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bartveneman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Aug 1, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #417 will degrade performances by 32.22%

Comparing fast-property-complexity-path (26d9e0a) with master (713579f)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
❌ 5 regressions

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark master fast-property-complexity-path Change
color names 656.8 µs 905 µs -27.43%
css-tricks-20231008.css (112.7kB) 508.3 ms 443.4 ms +14.63%
font shorthand 466.8 µs 551.4 µs -15.34%
high complexity/specificity selectors 702.1 µs 1,035.9 µs -32.22%
slice of Syntax.fm 5.9 ms 7.2 ms -18.11%
slice of nerdy.dev 7.5 ms 9.5 ms -21.07%

@bartveneman bartveneman closed this Aug 1, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Bundle Report

Bundle size has no change ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants