-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Smart status availability #260
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Smart status availability #260
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Deezzir <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deezzir <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deezzir <[email protected]>
798826f
to
c2cce7b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this the only place we need to handle smart_status
not being present?
I believe so, so it is safe to merge |
@robbat2 Can you please merge? |
I do not have merge permissions in this repo; I am just a frequent contributor. |
@SuperQ can you merge? |
There is no point in exporting
smartctl_device_smart_status
metric for logical devices such as HW Raids if they do not support S.M.A.R.T. We can simply skip the metric if the objectsmart_status
is not present.Closes: #224
Closes: canonical/hardware-observer-operator#357