bpo-12403: Mention sys.displayhook in code module docs and the compile builtin docs #26217
Conversation
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). CLA MissingOur records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA: For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
Doc/library/code.rst
Outdated
| * Exception tracebacks and syntax errors are written to :data:`sys.stderr` by | ||
| default but can be redirected by setting :func:`sys.excepthook`. | ||
| All output is printed to :data:`sys.stderr` by default. A user can override | ||
| :meth:`InteractiveConsole.write` in a derived class to change that. Alternatively, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please wrap this so that no line is more than 80 chars.
Before we make this documented behavior, let's make sure that there are unit tests ensuring it is true.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think there are tests for excepthook, but not for displayhook:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Lib/test/test_code_module.py
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2021-05-25-20-35-37.bpo-12403.8BFtwS.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…BFtwS.rst Co-authored-by: Irit Katriel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Irit Katriel <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 5130904. My bad.
| :meth:`InteractiveConsole.write` in a derived class to change that. | ||
| Alternatively, it is possible to selectively redirect parts of the output: | ||
|
|
||
| * The return values of successfully interpreted Python statements are printed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line is technically incorrect; statements don't have return values. I suppose it means the evaluated value of ast.Expr statements.
github-actions
bot
removed
the
stale
willingc
added
stale
This includes the patch submitted in the issue, and the wording suggested by @iritkatriel .
https://bugs.python.org/issue12403
Co-authored-by: Aaron Iles [email protected]
https://bugs.python.org/issue12403