Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in PP output layer shape #354

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wconstab
Copy link
Contributor

@wconstab wconstab commented May 22, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

mostly harmless bug, since output shape of last layer is not used for
send/recv purpose, the runtime value overrides it no matter what value
you configured it with.

However, since adding in/out shape validation to pipeline lib in torch,
this raises an error and has to be fixed.

[ghstack-poisoned]
This was referenced May 22, 2024
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot. label May 22, 2024
@wconstab wconstab merged commit 08aca37 into gh/wconstab/27/base May 22, 2024
4 checks passed
wconstab added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
mostly harmless bug, since output shape of last layer is not used for
send/recv purpose, the runtime value overrides it no matter what value
you configured it with.

However, since adding in/out shape validation to pipeline lib in torch,
this raises an error and has to be fixed.

ghstack-source-id: 950e41529b7b506085ab280d8a492e345eaefd24
Pull Request resolved: #354
@wconstab wconstab deleted the gh/wconstab/27/head branch May 22, 2024 20:48
tianyu-l pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
mostly harmless bug, since output shape of last layer is not used for
send/recv purpose, the runtime value overrides it no matter what value
you configured it with.

However, since adding in/out shape validation to pipeline lib in torch,
this raises an error and has to be fixed.

ghstack-source-id: 950e41529b7b506085ab280d8a492e345eaefd24
Pull Request resolved: #354
tianyu-l pushed a commit to tianyu-l/torchtitan_intern24 that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
mostly harmless bug, since output shape of last layer is not used for
send/recv purpose, the runtime value overrides it no matter what value
you configured it with.

However, since adding in/out shape validation to pipeline lib in torch,
this raises an error and has to be fixed.

ghstack-source-id: 950e41529b7b506085ab280d8a492e345eaefd24
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#354
tianyu-l pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
mostly harmless bug, since output shape of last layer is not used for
send/recv purpose, the runtime value overrides it no matter what value
you configured it with.

However, since adding in/out shape validation to pipeline lib in torch,
this raises an error and has to be fixed.

ghstack-source-id: 950e41529b7b506085ab280d8a492e345eaefd24
Pull Request resolved: #354
tianyu-l pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
mostly harmless bug, since output shape of last layer is not used for
send/recv purpose, the runtime value overrides it no matter what value
you configured it with.

However, since adding in/out shape validation to pipeline lib in torch,
this raises an error and has to be fixed.

ghstack-source-id: 950e41529b7b506085ab280d8a492e345eaefd24
Pull Request resolved: #354
philippguevorguian pushed a commit to YerevaNN/YNNtitan that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
mostly harmless bug, since output shape of last layer is not used for
send/recv purpose, the runtime value overrides it no matter what value
you configured it with.

However, since adding in/out shape validation to pipeline lib in torch,
this raises an error and has to be fixed.

ghstack-source-id: 950e41529b7b506085ab280d8a492e345eaefd24
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#354
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants