Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow opening synced realm in-memory. #8421

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

dianaafanador3
Copy link
Contributor

@dianaafanador3 dianaafanador3 commented Nov 17, 2023

This will allow setting and in-memory identifier on flexible sync realms, this will not create a .realm file or its associated auxiliary files for the synced realm and instead stores objects in memory while the realm is open and discards them immediately when all instances are closed.

@dianaafanador3 dianaafanador3 force-pushed the dp/allow_in_memory_synced_realms branch 4 times, most recently from 6e46f53 to 62a70dc Compare November 22, 2023 11:51
@dianaafanador3 dianaafanador3 marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2023 15:53
@dianaafanador3 dianaafanador3 force-pushed the dp/allow_in_memory_synced_realms branch from 075d10e to c39af96 Compare January 9, 2024 12:45
Realm/RLMRealmConfiguration.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
RealmSwift/RealmConfiguration.swift Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Realm/ObjectServerTests/AsyncSyncTests.swift Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rowungiles
Copy link

I'm super excited to see this. Thanks @dianaafanador3 and @tgoyne.

@dianaafanador3 dianaafanador3 merged commit 1ef89df into master Jan 23, 2024
117 checks passed
@dianaafanador3 dianaafanador3 deleted the dp/allow_in_memory_synced_realms branch January 23, 2024 20:19
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 14, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants