Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: corrected deprecated usage of ModuleLister.moduleAdded (#732) #740

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

adietish
Copy link
Contributor

(partially) fixes #732

@adietish adietish self-assigned this Mar 12, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sbouchet March 12, 2024 15:01
@adietish adietish changed the title corrected deprecated usage of ModuleLister.moduleAdded (#732) fix: corrected deprecated usage of ModuleLister.moduleAdded (#732) Mar 12, 2024
@adietish adietish force-pushed the issue-732 branch 2 times, most recently from 8120951 to f6109f5 Compare March 12, 2024 15:27
Copy link

@adietish
Copy link
Contributor Author

ModuleListener#modulesAdded was added in IC-2022.3 and this PR thus requires us to bump the minimal version from (currently) IC-2022.1 to IC-2022.3

@sbouchet
Copy link
Collaborator

ModuleListener#modulesAdded was added in IC-2022.3 and this PR thus requires us to bump the minimal version from (currently) IC-2022.1 to IC-2022.3

I think we'll bump minimal version when 2024.1 will be out .

Copy link

@adietish
Copy link
Contributor Author

ModuleListener#modulesAdded was added in IC-2022.3 and this PR thus requires us to bump the minimal version from (currently) IC-2022.1 to IC-2022.3

I think we'll bump minimal version when 2024.1 will be out .

I checked it and found out that I was wrong: the API required for this change only exists in IC-2023.1 (not present in IC-2022.3).

@sbouchet
Copy link
Collaborator

@adietish this is still a warning on current 1.9.0 release. can you update this fix with latest main branch ?

@adietish
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sbouchet: we're currently still at IC-2022.3 as minimum supported version. For this fix to be applicable we need IC-2023.1 (see #740 (comment))

Copy link

@mohitsuman
Copy link
Collaborator

@adietish what is the update on this PR ?

@adietish
Copy link
Contributor Author

adietish commented Sep 18, 2024

@mohitsuman, @sbouchet: we're still at 2022.3: Do we want to bump so that we can include this PR?

@mohitsuman
Copy link
Collaborator

@adietish Are there any challenges in bumping ?

@mohitsuman
Copy link
Collaborator

And should we move this PR our of Draft state ?

@sbouchet
Copy link
Collaborator

@mohitsuman @adietish : I propose to merge this PR after #889, bumping minimal version to 2023.1 .

@mohitsuman
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbouchet PR #889 can be merged when ?

@sbouchet
Copy link
Collaborator

sbouchet commented Oct 1, 2024

@sbouchet PR #889 can be merged when ?

almost, there is still Integration UI test failures that @martinszuc is looking at

@adietish
Copy link
Contributor Author

adietish commented Oct 2, 2024

@sbouchet rebased it.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 2, 2024

@sbouchet
Copy link
Collaborator

sbouchet commented Oct 4, 2024

as expected, minimal version check (22.3) failed. let's wait for minimal version bump before merging this one.

@adietish
Copy link
Contributor Author

adietish commented Jan 29, 2025

@sbouchet: intellij-kubernetes is now requiring IC-2023.1. We could thus now bump this and merge this?

@adietish adietish marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 12:28
@adietish adietish added this to the 1.11.0 milestone Jan 29, 2025
@sbouchet
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbouchet: intellij-kubernetes is now requiring IC-2023.1. We could thus now bump this and merge this?

yes, now is a good time to do so.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sbouchet sbouchet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbouchet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@adietish
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-openshift "Integration UI Tests with Local Kind Cluster Context Report"

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2025

@adietish: Overrode contexts on behalf of adietish: Integration UI Tests with Local Kind Cluster Context Report, ci/prow/e2e-openshift

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-openshift "Integration UI Tests with Local Kind Cluster Context Report"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@adietish
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override "Integration UI Tests with Local Kind Cluster Context Report"

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2025

@adietish: Overrode contexts on behalf of adietish: Integration UI Tests with Local Kind Cluster Context Report

In response to this:

/override "Integration UI Tests with Local Kind Cluster Context Report"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@redhat-developer redhat-developer deleted a comment from openshift-ci bot Jan 29, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2474d44 into redhat-developer:main Jan 29, 2025
20 of 21 checks passed
@adietish adietish deleted the issue-732 branch January 29, 2025 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix usage of deprecated APIs
3 participants