Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(server,worker): resolve copier metadata bug #1364

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

nourbalaha
Copy link
Contributor

@nourbalaha nourbalaha commented Jan 20, 2025

Overview

This PR resolve the copier metadata bug

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced database secret configuration with updated environment variable names.
    • Improved model copying process with more detailed change tracking and metadata.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated database connection environment variables across multiple components.
    • Improved type safety and error handling in ID generation process.
  • Refactor

    • Modified task change tracking to support more flexible value types.
    • Updated operator context in testing to include more comprehensive user information.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a series of changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on updating database-related environment variables and secret configurations. The modifications involve renaming environment variables from REEARTH_CMS_WORKER_DB to REEARTH_CMS_DB, updating the DBSecretName default value, and enhancing the copyItems method with additional metadata tracking. The changes span infrastructure, usecase, and worker components, ensuring consistent database connection and task copying mechanisms.

Changes

File Change Summary
server/internal/infrastructure/gcp/config.go Updated DBSecretName default value from "reearth-cms-worker-db" to "reearth-cms-db"
server/internal/infrastructure/gcp/taskrunner.go Replaced environment variable REEARTH_CMS_WORKER_DB with REEARTH_CMS_DB in SecretEnv and AvailableSecrets
server/internal/usecase/interactor/model.go Enhanced copyItems method with timestamp and expanded change tracking
server/internal/usecase/interactor/model_test.go Updated op variable with additional AcOperator context
server/pkg/task/task.go Changed Change struct's Value type to any and added ChangeTypeULID constant
worker/cmd/copier/main.go Updated environment variable from REEARTH_CMS_WORKER_DB to REEARTH_CMS_DB
worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go Improved error handling and ID generation for new change types

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant ModelInteractor
    participant TaskManager
    participant DatabaseSecret
    
    Client->>ModelInteractor: Request Model Copy
    ModelInteractor->>TaskManager: Initiate Copy with Timestamp
    TaskManager->>DatabaseSecret: Retrieve DB Connection
    DatabaseSecret-->>TaskManager: Return Connection Details
    TaskManager->>ModelInteractor: Process Copy with Enhanced Metadata
    ModelInteractor->>Client: Return Copied Model
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • rot1024
  • yk-eukarya

Poem

🐰 Hopping through code with glee,
Secrets renamed, variables set free!
From worker to CMS, paths align,
Database connections now shine bright.
A rabbit's refactor, pure delight! 🔧


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 86dba9b and 996f1c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • server/internal/usecase/interactor/model.go (6 hunks)
  • worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go (3 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2025

👷 Deploy Preview for reearth-cms processing.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 08d29fe
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-cms/deploys/678e369e3453ac000782db98

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Deploy Preview for reearth-cms canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 996f1c4
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-cms/deploys/678e67bc0447ee0008f2d9f4

@nourbalaha nourbalaha changed the title fix(server-worker) resolve copier metadata bug fix(server,worker): resolve copier metadata bug Jan 20, 2025
@nourbalaha nourbalaha marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2025 14:43
@nourbalaha nourbalaha requested a review from rot1024 as a code owner January 20, 2025 14:43
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e04cebf and 86dba9b.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • server/internal/infrastructure/gcp/config.go (1 hunks)
  • server/internal/infrastructure/gcp/taskrunner.go (2 hunks)
  • server/internal/usecase/interactor/model.go (5 hunks)
  • server/internal/usecase/interactor/model_test.go (1 hunks)
  • server/pkg/task/task.go (1 hunks)
  • worker/cmd/copier/main.go (1 hunks)
  • worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
server/internal/infrastructure/gcp/config.go (1)

15-15: LGTM! Environment variable renamed consistently.

The change to DBSecretName default value aligns with the broader initiative to standardize database-related environment variables across the application.

worker/cmd/copier/main.go (1)

30-30: LGTM! Environment variable updated consistently.

The database environment variable has been updated to match the new standardized naming convention, and proper error handling is maintained through mustGetEnv.

worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go (2)

73-84: LGTM! Improved type safety and error handling.

The changes enhance type safety through proper type assertions and error handling for ULID operations.


117-118: LGTM! Added support for version type.

The addition of the "version" case in generateId with UUID generation is a good enhancement.

server/internal/infrastructure/gcp/taskrunner.go (1)

173-173: LGTM! Environment variables updated consistently.

The database secret environment variable has been updated consistently in both the SecretEnv array and SecretManagerSecret configuration.

Also applies to: 184-184

server/pkg/task/task.go (2)

67-67: Consider type safety implications of using any.

Changing Value from string to any makes the field more flexible but potentially less type-safe. This could lead to runtime errors if type assertions aren't properly handled by consumers of this struct.

Let's verify how this field is used across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Type safety concerns are properly addressed

The codebase demonstrates safe handling of the any type through:

  • Proper type assertions with error checking for each change type
  • Clear mapping between change types and their expected value types
  • Comprehensive error handling to prevent runtime panics
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for places where Change struct is used and type assertions are performed
ast-grep --pattern 'change.Value.($$$)'

Length of output: 213


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full context of type assertions in copier.go
rg "change.Value" -B 5 -A 5

# Search for any direct usage of Change.Value
ast-grep --pattern 'change.Value'

# Search for type switches on Change.Value
ast-grep --pattern 'switch $_ := change.Value.(type) {'

Length of output: 14865


72-74: Verify the implementation of the new ULID change type.

The addition of ChangeTypeULID suggests handling of ULID-based changes. Ensure that all code paths handling ChangeType are updated to properly handle this new type.

Let's verify the implementation:

✅ Verification successful

ULID change type implementation is complete and correct

The implementation in worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go properly handles ULID modifications with complete error handling and proper integration with the bulk copy operation. The code correctly:

  • Parses existing ULIDs
  • Modifies timestamps
  • Handles errors appropriately
  • Stores modified ULIDs
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for switch/if statements handling ChangeType
ast-grep --pattern 'switch $_ := $_.Type.(type) {
  $$$
}'

# Search for direct comparisons with ChangeType
rg "ChangeType(Set|New|ULID)"

Length of output: 1707


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of the copier switch case
rg -A 10 "case task.ChangeTypeULID:" worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go

# Check for test coverage of ULID type
rg -A 5 "ChangeTypeULID" worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier_test.go

Length of output: 443


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete switch statement implementation
rg -B 5 -A 20 "switch change.Type {" worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go

# Search for ULID tests across all test files
rg -l "ChangeTypeULID.*Test" 

Length of output: 220


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the switch statement using ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'switch $_.Type {
  $$$
}' worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go

# Search for ULID tests with broader pattern
rg -l "ChangeTypeULID" "**/*_test.go"

Length of output: 185


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get complete copier.go content
cat worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go

# Find test files using fd
fd -e go -t f test

Length of output: 13425

server/internal/usecase/interactor/model_test.go (1)

544-549: Properly initialize operator in tests with AcOperator.

Adding AcOperator with User to the operator in the test setup ensures that the tests accurately reflect the production code changes and prevents nil pointer dereferences during testing.

worker/internal/infrastructure/mongo/copier.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
server/internal/usecase/interactor/model.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
server/internal/usecase/interactor/model.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/internal/usecase/interactor/model.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/internal/usecase/interactor/model.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nourbalaha nourbalaha merged commit 859b41d into main Jan 20, 2025
22 checks passed
@nourbalaha nourbalaha deleted the fix-server-worker/copier-metadata branch January 20, 2025 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants