Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix amendments backtracking #298

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix amendments backtracking #298

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pdp2121
Copy link
Collaborator

@pdp2121 pdp2121 commented Jan 22, 2025

High Level Overview of Change

There are 2 issues with amendment backtracking and status retrieval:

  • ledger rpc for API v2 with transactions and expand enabled does not match LedgerResponseExpanded field on xrpl.js. Use v1 for now.
  • s2 Clio often reached rate limit when backtracking amendments for mainnet. Use xrpl-cluster instead.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
  • Tests (You added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
  • Documentation Updates
  • Release

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ const AMENDMENT_VERSION_REGEX =
/\| \[(?<amendmentName>[a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\][^\n]+\| (?<version>v[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.[0-9]*|TBD) *\|/u

export const NETWORKS_HOSTS = new Map([
['main', 'ws://s2.ripple.com:51233'],
['main', 'wss://xrplcluster.com'],
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this changed?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We often got rate limit while looping and sending ledger and tx RPC to clio (not sure if it's because of the recent issue) to backtrack amendments. We can either change this to xrpl-cluster completely or use it as a backup.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has this been discussed with the Clio folks?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RippledError(You are placing too much load on the server., {\"error\":\"slowDown\",\"error_code\":10,\"error_message\":\"You are placing too much load on the server.\",\"status\":\"error This happens once in a while with Clio

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just posted my question on their channel

@@ -264,11 +264,15 @@ async function backtrackNetworkAmendmentStatus(
index < currentLedger;
index += 256
) {
// Use api V1 instead of the default (V2) since we don't have the correct
// LedgerResponseExpanded type for V2
// TODO: change to V2 once the issue is fixed.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I recommend linking to the xrpl.js issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants