Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix broken link + add link + cleanup #65

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix broken link + add link + cleanup #65

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions inst/templates/review.txt
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,15 +12,14 @@ The structure of this review is up to you, but it's usually about a page long an
* Article: Is anything unclear? Is anything missing? Are the examples helpful? Is there sufficient background, including alternative approaches in R?

* Package: Could the functions presented be improved? Some ideas at http://bit.ly/1aYwkp3. Could the code be improved? Some good advice on code style can be found in
- "R packages" chapter 7 by Hadley Wickham at https://r-pkgs.org/r.html,
- "R Packages" chapter 7 by Hadley Wickham and Jenny Bryan at https://r-pkgs.org/Code.html,
- "rOpenSci Packages: Development, Maintenance, and Peer Review" at https://devguide.ropensci.org/building.html,
- "What I look for in 'Software Papers'" by Carl Boettiger at https://www.carlboettiger.info/2013/06/13/what-I-look-for-in-software-papers.html
- Using the "styler" package,
- Using the ["styler" package](https://styler.r-lib.org/),
- and avoiding the features warned against by Jenny Bryan at https://www.tidyverse.org/articles/2017/12/workflow-vs-script/

Reviews should be returned by email. Our preferred format for the review is a text file attachment, but a pdf is also acceptable. This will be sent on to the authors. Your email should also give your overall recommendation (this part is for the editor only): Accept with minor revisions (you won't see it again), accept with major revisions (you'll re-review the revisions), or reject.


Please let me know if you are willing to take on this review. I would like to receive the review, if possible, by {{date}}.

Regards,
Expand Down