Service introspection #602
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
clalancette
requested review from
adityapande-1995,
audrow and
mjeronimo
as code owners
14 tasks
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
clalancette
force-pushed
the
service_introspection
branch
from
339183d
to
699760b
Compare
mjeronimo
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2023
mjcarroll
approved these changes
Feb 28, 2023
|
CI for this is in ros2/ros2#1285 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is demos of how to use service introspection in both rclcpp and rclpy. It is part of ros2/ros2#1285, and should not be merged without the dependent PRs (listed below).
Depends on: ros2/rcl#997
Depends on: ros2/rclpy#988
Depends on: ros2/rclcpp#1985