Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary 'type: ignore' comments in tracetools_trace #151

Conversation

christophebedard
Copy link
Member

They were added in 9450bfe, but they are not needed, at least not anymore.

However, we still need them for the .completer assignments, since that's not really an argparse.Action attribute. It's used by argcomplete, if available.

They were added in 9450bfe, but they
are not needed, at least not anymore.

However, we still need them for the `.completer` assignments, since
that's not really an `argparse.Action` attribute. It's used by
`argcomplete`, if available.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <[email protected]>
@christophebedard christophebedard self-assigned this Feb 18, 2025
@christophebedard
Copy link
Member Author

@ros-pull-request-builder retest this please

@ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor

ahcorde commented Feb 18, 2025

Pulls: #151
Gist: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ahcorde/9265c639f029e62e8c79b2f7844b073f/raw/2a0eac65a0ed3c4c7f08650ab3e84369ee897244/ros2.repos
BUILD args: --packages-above-and-dependencies tracetools_trace
TEST args: --packages-above tracetools_trace
ROS Distro: rolling
Job: ci_launcher
ci_launcher ran: https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_launcher/15217

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • Linux-rhel Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@christophebedard christophebedard merged commit 7a15085 into rolling Feb 19, 2025
9 checks passed
@christophebedard christophebedard deleted the christophebedard/remove-unnecessary-type-ignore-tracetools-trace-args branch February 19, 2025 00:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants