Draft CITATION.cff #384
Merged
Draft CITATION.cff #384
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Created using https://citation-file-format.github.io/cff-initializer-javascript/ based on the info in `AUTHORS` and andreifoldes's [sample](#333 (comment))
|
Hi @caiw , thanks for this. I've made some suggestions; I think it may be best at this stage to use "development group" instead of figuring out an author list. Note that this is very much a temporary solution since we hope to have a manuscript in pre-print soon to be cited and we should also add clearer citation suggestions in the documentation for the various methods that we implement, e.g. Schütt et al for inference. |
JasperVanDenBosch
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2024
|
Good idea! |
the promised date was in the past
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Created using cffinit based on the info in
AUTHORSand @andreifoldes's sample, after the favourable response to the issue. (Fixes #333.)Note about author order: I copied this from the
AUTHORSfile, in which I'm listed, but I have no opinion about author order: please don't interpret my copying of the order as such! Alternatively it could just be "RSA Development Group" without named authors. (Side note, apologies for any mis-pastes, or if I swapped anyone's given and family names.)