Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(wht): remove unused wht definitions #1852

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

arpl
Copy link
Contributor

@arpl arpl commented Dec 31, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

Remove unused wht definitions and its corresponding deploy selector.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated deployment script to remove "wht-lib-project" selector option
    • Removed multiple configuration files for various feature projects
  • Refactor

    • Simplified command-line interface for deployment script
    • Cleaned up project configuration directory structure

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request involves removing multiple db-config.json configuration files from various project directories under src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/ and modifying the scripts/deployToDB.py script. The script changes include removing the "wht-lib-project" selector from the ALL_SELECTORS list and updating the corresponding command-line argument help text. These modifications suggest a restructuring of project configuration management and deployment options.

Changes

File Change Summary
scripts/deployToDB.py Removed "wht-lib-project" from ALL_SELECTORS list and updated help text for selector argument
src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/*/db-config.json Deleted configuration files for multiple projects:
- libres360_base_features
- libres360_ecommerce_features
- libres360_shopify_features
- libres360_stripe_features

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • lvrach
  • RanjeetMishra
  • krishna2020
  • ItsSudip
  • sandeepdsvs

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, config files fade away,
Selectors trimmed with a playful sway,
Deployment script gets a clean new face,
Rabbit's code dance leaves no trace! 🚀
Simplicity hops into our embrace! 🌈

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04797e9 and e8b6432.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • scripts/deployToDB.py (2 hunks)
  • src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/libres360_base_features/db-config.json (0 hunks)
  • src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/libres360_ecommerce_features/db-config.json (0 hunks)
  • src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/libres360_shopify_features/db-config.json (0 hunks)
  • src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/libres360_stripe_features/db-config.json (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
  • src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/libres360_shopify_features/db-config.json
  • src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/libres360_base_features/db-config.json
  • src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/libres360_stripe_features/db-config.json
  • src/configurations/wht-lib-projects/libres360_ecommerce_features/db-config.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
scripts/deployToDB.py (2)

22-22: Updated help text to reflect the removal of "wht-lib-project"

Changing the help text to mention only "destination or source" is appropriate given that "wht-lib-project" has been removed. This helps ensure users understand the new limited scope of valid arguments.


11-11: Removal of "wht-lib-project" from ALL_SELECTORS

Dropping "wht-lib-project" from the list aligns with the stated PR objective of removing unused "wht" definitions and their deployment options. However, please make sure there are no references to "wht-lib-project" in environment variables or elsewhere in the codebase (e.g., CI/CD pipelines, downstream scripts).

Run the following script to ensure no further references remain:

✅ Verification successful

No references to "wht-lib-project" found in the codebase

The ripgrep search returned no results, confirming that there are no remaining references to "wht-lib-project" in the codebase. This validates that the removal of this selector from ALL_SELECTORS is safe and aligns with the PR's objective of cleaning up unused "wht" definitions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for "wht-lib-project" references across the repository
rg "wht-lib-project"

Length of output: 20


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (04797e9) to head (e8b6432).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #1852   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           53        53           
  Branches         7         7           
=========================================
  Hits            53        53           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@arpl arpl merged commit 5b1bd34 into develop Jan 2, 2025
15 checks passed
@arpl arpl deleted the feat/remove-unused-wht-definitions branch January 2, 2025 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants