Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add tracing #551

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

add tracing #551

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

This PR does some changes to how logging is done and displayed.

More work maybe needed.

Depends on rust-embedded/svd#172

@Emilgardis Emilgardis requested a review from a team as a code owner November 9, 2021 22:09
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @reitermarkus

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-tools labels Nov 9, 2021
@Emilgardis Emilgardis marked this pull request as draft November 9, 2021 22:09
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

currently looks like this

image

@burrbull
Copy link
Member

What is default log level?

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

Default log level is set on

.add_directive(tracing::Level::INFO.into()),

@burrbull
Copy link
Member

Any progress on this?

.without_time()
.with_target(false)
.with_env_filter(filter)
.compact()
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

with compact
image

with full
image

I prefer compact, looks cleaner imo

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd want to remove the render:expand:etcetc things, but that would require a custom formatter, simple to do but maybe not neccessary, this shouldn't be used often

@burrbull
Copy link
Member

burrbull commented Dec 7, 2021

@Emilgardis should I make new release or wait for this PR?

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

Go ahead with a release, this is breaking but can be made to not be :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-tools
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants