Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete design label from list in dev docs #18492

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

samestep
Copy link

@samestep samestep commented Nov 7, 2024

#7445 added an item to docs/dev/README.md describing and linking to the "Design" issue label, which I assume existed at the time. Later, #12722 updated that URL to point to the new repo location. However, this bullet point is now confusing for two reasons:

  1. The URL https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%Design is malformed. Clicking it in Firefox produces a blank page. Interestingly, clicking the URL while editing this Markdown file inside VS Code changes it to the different URL https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+label%25Design which is no longer malformed, but that just corresponds to the search string "is:open is:issue label%Design" which is not very meaningful.

  2. There are currently no issues labeled "Design". The corrected search URL https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+label:Design causes GitHub to display this warning message:

    Filter contains 1 issue:

    • Invalid value Design for label

Therefore, this PR deletes that bullet point from the docs.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants