Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Add parseQuery function for parsing query parameters in webRequestHandler class #37

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

drazisil
Copy link
Contributor

@drazisil drazisil commented Aug 9, 2024

Fixes IndexError: list index out of range #36

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new utility function for parsing query parameters from URL paths, enhancing modularity and maintainability.
    • Added unit tests to validate the functionality of the new query parsing feature.
    • Added a linting target to the Makefile to enhance code quality checks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling during the query parsing process for better reliability.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified the do_GET method by removing custom parsing logic and utilizing the new utility function.
    • Enhanced formatting and readability across multiple classes and methods.
  • Chores

    • Updated the Python version in the GitHub Actions workflow from 3.11 to 3.12 for improved performance and security.
    • Enhanced development environment configuration with updated dependencies for code quality tools.

…uestHandler class

Fixes IndexError: list index out of range #36
@drazisil drazisil self-assigned this Aug 9, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@drazisil has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3c07fb and 0c10d14.

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the modularity and maintainability of the codebase by refining the Gateway class's query parsing through an external parseQuery function. New unit tests ensure the robustness of this function. Additionally, the GitHub Actions workflow has been updated for Python 3.12, and a new linting process has been introduced to maintain code quality throughout the project.

Changes

Files Change Summary
pyrace/gateway/gateway.py, pyrace/gateway/parseQuery.py Removed parseQuery method from Gateway, and added a new parseQuery function for extracting query parameters.
tests/test_gateway.py Introduced unit tests for the parseQuery function to validate its behavior across multiple scenarios.
.github/workflows/python-app.yml, Makefile Upgraded Python version to 3.12 and added a new lint target for code quality checks with flake8.
pyproject.toml Added dev-dependencies for flake8, black, pytest, pytest-cov, and coverage; set line length for black to 127.
pyrace/shared/encryption.py Enhanced error handling in verifyLegacyCipherSupport function.
pyrace/shared/logging.py Minor formatting improvements for readability in logging functions.

Poem

🐇 In the code where queries flow,
A little rabbit hopped, with a gleeful glow.
"No more clutter, so neat and bright,
With parseQuery in sight, all feels just right!
Hopping through tests, all errors we flee,
A modular world, so happy and free!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c90202 and 851e05d.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • pyrace/gateway/gateway.py (3 hunks)
  • pyrace/gateway/parseQuery.py (1 hunks)
  • pyrace/gateway/test_gateway.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
pyrace/gateway/gateway.py (1)

Line range hint 25-46:
Ensure proper integration of parseQuery in do_GET.

The integration of the parseQuery function into the do_GET method looks correct. However, consider the following:

  1. Error Handling: Ensure that any exceptions raised by parseQuery are properly handled. Since parseQuery already captures exceptions, this is likely sufficient, but verify that no additional handling is needed in do_GET.

  2. Logging: The logging statement effectively logs the parsed query. Ensure that sensitive information is not logged, especially if the query parameters may contain PII.

  3. Performance: The use of parseQuery simplifies the do_GET method, promoting modularity and maintainability, which is a positive change.

Overall, the refactor enhances the clarity and maintainability of the code.

Comment on lines 4 to 34
def parseQuery(path):
"""
Parses the query string from the URL path and returns a dictionary of key-value pairs.
Returns:
dict: A dictionary containing the parsed query parameters.
Raises:
Exception: If an error occurs during parsing.
"""
# code implementation
try:
queryDict = {}

if "?" not in path:
return queryDict

pathParts = path.split("?")

if len(pathParts) == 0:
return queryDict

query = pathParts[1]
queryParts = query.split("&")

if len(queryParts) == 0:
return queryDict

for part in queryParts:
key, value = part.split("=")
queryDict[key] = value
return queryDict
except Exception as e:
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Aug 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Improve error handling and performance in parseQuery.

  1. Error Handling: The function currently captures all exceptions and logs them using Sentry. While this is useful for debugging, it might be beneficial to handle specific exceptions, such as ValueError, which can occur if the query string is malformed. This would allow for more precise error reporting and potentially different handling strategies for different errors.

  2. Performance Optimization: The current implementation splits the path and query string multiple times. This can be optimized by using Python's urllib.parse module, which is designed for parsing URLs and query strings efficiently. Here's a suggestion:

    from urllib.parse import urlparse, parse_qs
    
    def parseQuery(path):
        """
        Parses the query string from the URL path and returns a dictionary of key-value pairs.
        """
        try:
            queryDict = parse_qs(urlparse(path).query)
            return {k: v[0] for k, v in queryDict.items()}
        except Exception as e:
            capture_exception(e)
            return {}

This refactor uses urlparse and parse_qs to handle the parsing, which is more robust and efficient.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please create an issue for this.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@drazisil, I've created the issue for the suggested improvements to the parseQuery function. You can find it here: Issue #38.

Analysis chain
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Create a new GitHub issue for the suggested improvements in the `parseQuery` function.
gh issue create --title "Improve error handling and performance in parseQuery function" --body "The current implementation of the \`parseQuery\` function in the \`pyrace.gateway.parseQuery\` module can be improved in the following ways:

1. **Error Handling**: The function captures all exceptions and logs them using Sentry. It would be beneficial to handle specific exceptions, such as \`ValueError\`, for more precise error reporting.

2. **Performance Optimization**: The function splits the path and query string multiple times. Using Python's \`urllib.parse\` module can optimize this process. Here's a suggestion:

    \`\`\`python
    from urllib.parse import urlparse, parse_qs

    def parseQuery(path):
        try:
            queryDict = parse_qs(urlparse(path).query)
            return {k: v[0] for k, v in queryDict.items()}
        except Exception as e:
            capture_exception(e)
            return {}
    \`\`\`

This refactor uses \`urlparse\` and \`parse_qs\` for more robust and efficient parsing.

For further details, refer to the discussion in [PR #37](https://github.com/rustymotors/pyrace/pull/37#discussion_r1711206603)." --assignee drazisil

Length of output: 1214

pyrace/gateway/test_gateway.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 851e05d and 2981223.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/python-app.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/python-app.yml (1)

21-24: Update Python version to 3.12.

The Python version has been updated from 3.11 to 3.12. This change ensures the application is tested with the latest stable Python release, which includes performance improvements and new features.

Ensure that all dependencies and the codebase are compatible with Python 3.12. If there are any compatibility issues, consider updating the dependencies or adjusting the codebase accordingly.

Fixes Improve error handling and performance in parseQuery function #38
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/L and removed size/M labels Aug 9, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/python-app.yml (1)

21-24: Potential compatibility issue with Python 3.12.

The use of asyncio.get_event_loop() in pyrace/gateway/gateway.py may cause compatibility issues with Python 3.12 due to its deprecation. Consider updating this to asyncio.get_running_loop() or another appropriate alternative.

  • pyrace/gateway/gateway.py: asyncio.get_event_loop() usage.

Please verify and update the code to ensure compatibility with Python 3.12.

Analysis chain

Update Python version to 3.12.

The Python version has been updated to 3.12. Ensure that all dependencies and the codebase are compatible with this version.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify compatibility of the codebase with Python 3.12.

# Test: Check for any Python 3.12 specific syntax or features.
rg --type py -A 2 $'python-version: "3.12"'

Length of output: 44


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for Python dependencies in requirements files.
fd -e txt -e in -e pip -e cfg -g '*requirements*' --exec cat

# Check for deprecated syntax or features in Python files.
rg --type py -e 'asyncio.get_event_loop' -e 'collections.Mapping' -e 'collections.MutableMapping' -e 'collections.Sequence' -e 'collections.Set' -e 'collections.MutableSet' -e 'collections.MutableSequence'

Length of output: 331

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2981223 and 9d2156e.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pdm.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/python-app.yml (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
  • pyrace/gateway/parseQuery.py (1 hunks)
  • pyrace/gateway/test_gateway.py (1 hunks)
  • tox.ini (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tox.ini
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • pyrace/gateway/parseQuery.py
  • pyrace/gateway/test_gateway.py
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/python-app.yml (1)

32-32: Use make lint for linting.

Switching to make lint encapsulates the linting configuration within the Makefile, which is a good practice for maintainability.

pyproject.toml (2)

26-29: Add dev-dependencies for flake8 and black.

Including flake8 and black in dev-dependencies ensures these tools are available in the development environment, promoting code quality and consistency.


52-53: Configure black with a line length of 127.

Setting the line length to 127 for black standardizes code formatting across the project, aligning with the width of the GitHub editor.

Makefile (2)

17-21: Add lint target for code quality checks.

The lint target uses flake8 to enforce code quality, checking for syntax errors and complexity. This integration into the build process is beneficial for maintaining high code standards.


48-48: Include lint in .PHONY.

Adding lint to .PHONY ensures it is treated as a command, not a file, which is important for proper execution in make.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d2156e and 699c50c.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/python-app.yml (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_gateway.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/python-app.yml
  • Makefile
Additional comments not posted (6)
tests/test_gateway.py (6)

4-8: Test case for empty path looks good.

The test correctly verifies that an empty path returns an empty dictionary.


10-13: Test case for path without query parameters is correct.

The test accurately expects an empty dictionary for a path with no query parameters.


15-18: Test case for single query parameter is valid.

The test correctly expects a dictionary with the single query parameter parsed.


20-23: Test case for multiple query parameters is accurate.

The test correctly expects a dictionary with all query parameters parsed.


25-28: Test case for special characters in query parameters is correct.

The test accurately expects the special characters to be decoded in the result.


30-33: Test case for malformed query string is appropriate.

The test correctly expects the function to parse only the valid parts of the query string.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 699c50c and 44a7b55.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pdm.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (11)
  • .github/workflows/python-app.yml (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
  • pyrace/gateway/console.py (3 hunks)
  • pyrace/gateway/gateway.py (3 hunks)
  • pyrace/gateway/web.py (1 hunks)
  • pyrace/gui.py (1 hunks)
  • pyrace/shared/encryption.py (2 hunks)
  • pyrace/shared/logging.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_config.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_encryption.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • pyrace/gui.py
  • pyrace/shared/logging.py
  • tests/test_config.py
  • tests/test_encryption.py
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/python-app.yml
  • Makefile
  • pyproject.toml
Additional context used
Ruff
pyrace/gateway/console.py

25-25: Do not perform function call getLogger in argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable

(B008)

Additional comments not posted (6)
pyrace/gateway/web.py (1)

29-29: Correct usage of super().

The change to use super().server_activate() correctly invokes the superclass method. This ensures proper server activation.

pyrace/shared/encryption.py (1)

31-39: Improved error handling in verifyLegacyCipherSupport.

The use of a try block to catch exceptions improves robustness. Consider using a more specific exception type instead of the general Exception to provide more precise error handling.

pyrace/gateway/console.py (2)

Line range hint 34-58: Formatting improvements enhance readability.

The removal of unnecessary blank lines and compact parameter formatting improve code readability without affecting functionality.


25-25: Avoid mutable default arguments.

Move the getLogger call inside the constructor to prevent potential issues with mutable default arguments.

-    def __init__(self, parentThread: ServerBase, logger=getLogger("console")) -> None:
+    def __init__(self, parentThread: ServerBase, logger=None) -> None:
+        if logger is None:
+            logger = getLogger("console")

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Tools
Ruff

25-25: Do not perform function call getLogger in argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable

(B008)

pyrace/gateway/gateway.py (2)

23-23: Import statement looks good.

The import of parseQuery aligns with the changes made in the do_GET method.


41-43: Modularization of query parsing is effective.

The use of parseQuery(self.path) improves code modularity and maintainability by delegating parsing to a dedicated function.

Ensure that parseQuery handles all edge cases and exceptions effectively.

Verification successful

parseQuery function handles edge cases effectively.

The parseQuery function in pyrace/gateway/parseQuery.py is implemented with proper error handling and fallback mechanisms. It captures exceptions and returns an empty dictionary if parsing fails.

  • File: pyrace/gateway/parseQuery.py
  • Lines: Function parseQuery handles exceptions and logs them using capture_exception.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `parseQuery` function to ensure it handles edge cases and exceptions.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `parseQuery`. Expect: Proper handling of edge cases and exceptions.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def parseQuery($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 516


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `parseQuery` function to ensure it handles edge cases and exceptions.

# Corrected Test: Search for the implementation of `parseQuery`. Expect: Proper handling of edge cases and exceptions.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'def parseQuery($$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 516


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the `parseQuery` function definition and examine its implementation.

# Use `rg` to search for the function definition of `parseQuery`.
rg 'def parseQuery' -A 10

Length of output: 441

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44a7b55 and 381f76e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Makefile

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 381f76e and c3c07fb.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pdm.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pyproject.toml

@drazisil drazisil merged commit d3b40cf into main Aug 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@drazisil drazisil deleted the drazisil/issue36 branch August 9, 2024 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve error handling and performance in parseQuery function IndexError: list index out of range
1 participant