-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Iss119 #120
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Iss119 #120
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, thanks for the code :)
Do I understand correctly that it's an improvement, but there are still quite a few TODOs left (the ATTN comments) but that they are not necessary for your current use-case?
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ def assert_index_standardized(i: pd.DatetimeIndex, __right: bool = False): | |||
if tools_freq.up_or_down(freq, "D") > 0: | |||
if freq == "MS": | |||
period, not_ok = "month", ~i.is_month_start | |||
# ATTN!: again, this now wouldn't work as expected |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the comment applies to the QS and YS case, then de-indent it one level please
not really, attn comments are more to show that this line was changed and there were no tests for this function (where the comment is) with new freq |
fix to the issue 119: #119
changed functions in tools.isboundary.py to work with both objects and strings for frequencies
changes and notes can be found with ATTN!
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://portfolyo--120.org.readthedocs.build/en/120/