-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Onnx Feature Scorer #452
Onnx Feature Scorer #452
Conversation
…ed later on with the current version and once integrated in master branch
I thought this PR was about adding a new feature scorer not replacing and old? Also I think rasr is not defined. |
I agree with @Atticus1806 we should add a Featurescorer not replace Or is the tf label scorer removed from RASR code? |
I would add onnx feature scorer and later refactor the FH label scorer |
We discussed this some time ago and I wondered why this FS is still there. The code that is here would not work in any setup or branch of |
It has never been in the master version. This is from 4 years ago. Refactoring it would not bring anything since the new FS is completely different |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some small things
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If its deprecated and all tests pass I am not against removing, I don't know the details I just noticed that this was different from what I expected :).
Just make sure with AppTek I guess (do their tests claim completeness? If so I guess its fine if tests pass)
Once that is clear and the typing is changeed I think it can be approved :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks :)
We never used the deleted scorer, so it should be fine. |
PS: the current failing check is because of this:
|
Yes, solved |
@curufinwe I give you all passed tests and 3 approvals, do I get a merge from you? :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice
* added onnx FS and deleted the old FH label scorer, latter will be added later on with the current version and once integrated in master branch
Starting with the
apptek
version, I renamed some variables in order to decouple this from the old GMM feature scorer. Moreover, 2 internal rasr variables with their default values are added.The outdated wrong FH label scorer should be deleted.