Remove mupad bibliography

[nathanncohen]

Mupad-combinat has apparently been dead for the last 7 years.
http://mupad-combinat.sourceforge.net/

Regardless of that, Mupad is not part of Sage there is no reason why we should host its bibliography.

[haraldschilly]

I'm not sure sure about that. The text is in the past tense and initially, there must have been a reason why it is listed there.

[nathanncohen]

I'm not sure sure about that. The text is in the past tense and initially, there must have been a reason why it is listed there.

Combinat propaganda, here's why. Even Sage-combinat's publications have no place here. Either they are part of Sage and we merge the two, or they run their business and they can do it on their website. Nathann

[kcrisman]

I think it's reasonable to advertise any big piece of Sage development here, whether it's combinat or matroids or something symbolic - but I do agree that this should be updated and perhaps rearranged. Certainly all Sage publications of any kind should be advertised :)

[nathanncohen]

I think it's reasonable to advertise any big piece of Sage development here, whether it's combinat or matroids or something symbolic - but I do agree that this should be updated and perhaps rearranged. Certainly all Sage publications of any kind should be advertised :)

+1 About the rearrangement, I was thinking of having only one "Publications" page with everything on it it makes more sense from the user's point of view who may not know what Sage-combinat is (and its relationship with Sage). With Mupad, however, the situation is different: I do not even see the point of merging it on the same 'big' page: it is not Sage, it never was, and it is 7 years old dead. And it is not even up to date (see preprint from 1999). Nathann

[nathanncohen]

Updated. With this new branch, the following modifications are made:

• Only one link in the menu (toward library-publications.html)
• A link from library-publications.html to the mupad page.

[nthiery]

I looked at the latest commit, and it looks good to me! I am fine with having it merged.
Nathann: I just emmited a pull request going one step further (removing the link from the Sage citation list to the MuPAD citation list). I took the occasion to slightly improve the description of Sage-Combinat / MuPAD-Combinat.

[haraldschilly]

Uuuh, ok. I see. So @nathanncohen has to merge this: https://github.com/nthiery/website/commit/69dbf9f47722ba0fab4de7f47d385827960319cc and then I can review this here. Cool :-)

For the record: here is my issue #1 for the publications sub-project. Maybe this here is the perfect opportunity to get something started into that direction. Everything on one page is really bad UX.

[nthiery]

Yeah, sorry, I am still learning the best practices for this kind of things with pull requests. It's now an independent pull request (#53).

[haraldschilly]

ok, all set over here, too, thanks!