feat: Add more descriptive tooltips for scan options #92
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@matiasdaloia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request adds a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ScanDialog
participant ScanOption
participant TooltipComponent
User->>ScanDialog: Hover over a scan option
ScanDialog->>ScanOption: Provide option details (includes tooltip)
ScanOption->>TooltipComponent: Render tooltip information
TooltipComponent-->>User: Display additional context
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/entities/scan.go (1)
51-52: Differentiate tooltips from usage information.Some tooltips duplicate the usage information, which is redundant. Tooltips should provide additional context or examples that complement the usage description.
For example:
output: Instead of "Location where the scan results will be saved", consider "Results will be saved in JSON format. Use this to integrate with other tools or store scan history."flags: Instead of "Advanced scanning engine configuration flags", consider "Customize scanning behavior. Example: Use 16 to enable snippet matching."post-size: Instead of duplicating the usage, consider "Larger values may improve speed but increase memory usage. Reduce this value if you encounter memory issues."Also applies to: 56-57, 58-59, 70-71, 73-74, 75-76, 77-78
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
backend/entities/scan.go(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ScanDialog.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ScanOption.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/wailsjs/go/models.ts(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (3)
frontend/src/components/ScanOption.tsx (1)
37-37: LGTM!The changes to replace
usagewithtooltipare consistent and well-implemented. The component continues to function correctly while providing a better user experience through tooltips.Also applies to: 43-43, 135-135
frontend/src/components/ScanDialog.tsx (1)
249-249: LGTM!The update to use the
tooltipprop in theScanOptioncomponent is consistent with the changes in the component definition.frontend/wailsjs/go/models.ts (1)
378-378: LGTM!The addition of the
Tooltipfield to theScanArgDefclass and its initialization in the constructor are consistent with the backend changes.Also applies to: 393-393
matiasdaloia
deleted the
feature/mdaloia/88-bad-tool-tips-based-on-cli-flag-descriptions
branch
Summary by CodeRabbit