chore: add standard venv names and notebook checkpoints to gitignore

[phinate]

Tiny little PR for quality of life when people make venvs to look at cabinetry :)

feel free to do yourself if you don't want to give me easy contributor status ;)

[alexander-held]

Thanks, this is very useful to have! The CI issue is unrelated and another instance of #199, I will get that fixed separately.

[phinate]

fwiw, I think these and more are covered in github's standard python template, may be worth looking at: https://github.com/github/gitignore/blob/master/Python.gitignore

[alexander-held]

The CI issue should be fixed after rebasing on master. I had a look at the template you linked and would suggest adding .ipynb_checkpoints to this PR. Happy to extend the gitignore further if required in practice.

[phinate]

should be good now!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #229 (79ac627) into master (e773941) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 79ac627 differs from pull request most recent head 96f1429. Consider uploading reports for the commit 96f1429 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #229   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           15        15           
  Lines         1727      1727           
  Branches       268       268           
=========================================
  Hits          1727      1727           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e773941...96f1429. Read the comment docs.

[alexander-held]

The CI fails during Codecov upload, which should have been fixed by #230 upon which this branch is based. It is currently unclear to me why the token is not picked up in the CI here.

[alexander-held]

This is likely related to codecov/codecov-action#330, so let's see whether it can get resolved centrally. The fact that #230 worked fine may have just been a lucky coincidence.

[alexander-held]

Independent of Codecov, the release of mypy 0.900 requires another small update which will go in via #232. With that done and Codecov stabilized, it should then be able to get CI to pass here again.

[alexander-held]

With #232 done this PR now passed CI as well. Thanks for the contribution!