feat: make chunk and batch proposers respect fork boundaries

[omerfirmak]

Purpose or design rationale of this PR

PR title

Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:

• build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: yarn, eslint, typescript)
• ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: vercel, github, cypress)
• docs: Documentation-only changes
• feat: A new feature
• fix: A bug fix
• perf: A code change that improves performance
• refactor: A code change that doesn't fix a bug, or add a feature, or improves performance
• style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
• test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Deployment tag versioning

Has tag in common/version.go been updated or have you added bump-version label to this PR?

• No, this PR doesn't involve a new deployment, git tag, docker image tag
• Yes

Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

• No, this PR is not a breaking change
• Yes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.66667% with 10 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 57.22%. Comparing base (63f1b1e) to head (bf1c739).

Files	Patch %	Lines
rollup/internal/config/config.go	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1174      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    57.04%   57.22%   +0.17%     
===========================================
  Files          153      154       +1     
  Lines        11115    11183      +68     
===========================================
+ Hits          6341     6399      +58     
- Misses        4326     4336      +10     
  Partials       448      448              

Flag	Coverage Δ
common	60.49% <100.00%> (+1.18%)	⬆️
coordinator	20.26% <ø> (ø)
database	42.85% <ø> (ø)
rollup	66.54% <72.97%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[colinlyguo]

LGTM. Left some comments, and the refactor comments are the same as @georgehao.

[georgehao]

BTW, I will checkout your branch to write coordinator logic: assign task to multi version prover, because I want reuse your forks common logic. Pls don't use hard push. Thx, hahaha