Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ✨ add check_resource_properties [5/7] #965

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: feat/sprout-checks-4-sprout-specific-package-and-resource-errors
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

martonvago
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR adds the top-level check function for resource properties in Sprout.

It also adds a "summary" error that is raised when any specific CheckError is found by any of the inner check functions.

Closes #937

This PR needs an in-depth review.

Checklist

  • Added or updated tests
  • Updated documentation
  • Ran just run-all

@martonvago martonvago self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This function is very similar to the other two top-level functions check_package_properties and check_properties (in other PRs). We can commonise some bits later if we want.

@martonvago martonvago changed the title feat: ✨ add check_resource_properties feat: ✨ add check_resource_properties [5/7] Jan 10, 2025
@martonvago martonvago marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 23:21
@martonvago martonvago requested a review from a team as a code owner January 10, 2025 23:21
martonvago and others added 3 commits January 14, 2025 17:00
Copy link
Member

@lwjohnst86 lwjohnst86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just a few comments 🙌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants