Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Remove async example #1094

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

e-carlin
Copy link

Fixes #988

The async example never actually worked in an async way. It tricked users into thinking they were using async code but in reality the sendgrid_client.send call (which is what was waiting on I/O) was still blocking.

In addition, asyncio.async (used in the example) was deprecated in Python 3.7 and removed in Python 3.10.

Checklist

  • I acknowledge that all my contributions will be made under the project's license
  • I have made a material change to the repo (functionality, testing, spelling, grammar)
  • I have read the Contribution Guidelines and my PR follows them
  • I have titled the PR appropriately
  • I have updated my branch with the main branch
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added the necessary documentation about the functionality in the appropriate .md file
  • I have added inline documentation to the code I modified

The async example never actually worked in an async way. It tricked
users into thinking they were using async code but in reality the
sendgrid_client.send call (which is what was waiting on I/O) was still
blocking.

In addition, asyncio.async (used in the example) was deprecated in
Python 3.7 and removed in Python 3.10.
@e-carlin e-carlin changed the title Fix: Remove async example fix: Remove async example Oct 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Asyncio example is completely wrong, update
1 participant