Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fill out IANA section #29

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged

Fill out IANA section #29

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

richsalz
Copy link
Collaborator

I filled in the text for the IANA Considerations section.

I am not sure if "standards action" is appropriate, but can live with it if you agree. Expert review seems better, and similar to what other JSON registries do. Thoughts?

I deleted the comment about I18N because I'm not sure it matters, since it's just JSON. Was that wrong to do?

draft-ietf-tls-wkech.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
</t>
</section>

<section title="JSON HTTP Origin Information">

<t>If approved, this specification requests the creation of an IANA
registry named "JSON HTTP Origin Info" with a Standards Action
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we don't expect extensions here, we might not need a registry at all. For example, we aren't asking for a registry for the inner object ("alias", "target", etc.).

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dunno, I would think #14 might add things?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that's just another SvcParamKey.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, we might move regeninterval to the top-level :)

@richsalz richsalz mentioned this pull request Jun 12, 2024
@richsalz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

And I added the registry entry for the top-level regeninterval field, as discussed in #28

@richsalz richsalz mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2024
@richsalz richsalz merged commit bb2ee1c into master Jun 13, 2024
@richsalz richsalz deleted the edit-4 branch June 13, 2024 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants