Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for replaying logs happen on async server operations #1649

Conversation

AbanoubGhadban
Copy link
Collaborator

@AbanoubGhadban AbanoubGhadban commented Sep 24, 2024

Summary

Remove this paragraph and provide a general description of the code changes in your pull
request... were there any bugs you had fixed? If so, mention them. If
these bugs have open GitHub issues, be sure to tag them here as well,
to keep the conversation linked together.

Pull Request checklist

Remove this line after checking all the items here. If the item is not applicable to the PR, both check it out and wrap it by ~.

  • Add/update test to cover these changes
  • Update documentation
  • Update CHANGELOG file
    Add the CHANGELOG entry at the top of the file.

Other Information

Remove this paragraph and mention any other important and relevant information such as benchmarks.


This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of console.history to ensure accurate console replay functionality across different execution contexts.
    • Enhanced management of console.history based on the rendering outcome, ensuring it resets appropriately.
  • New Features

    • Added support for custom console history in console replay functionality, allowing for greater flexibility in console state management.
    • Introduced new types and functions to streamline the server rendering process for React components, enhancing error handling and output management.
    • Updated the isPromise function to handle a broader range of input types for improved flexibility.
    • Added new properties to the RegisteredComponent interface to improve component registration and rendering capabilities.
    • Initialized console.history as an empty array during server rendering for better console log management.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce enhancements to the consoleReplay and buildConsoleReplay functions in the buildConsoleReplay.ts file, allowing for an optional customConsoleHistory parameter. The isPromise function in isServerRenderResult.ts has been updated to accept a broader range of input types. The serverRenderReactComponent.ts file has undergone significant restructuring, adding new types and functions to improve the server rendering process for React components. Additionally, the RegisteredComponent interface in types/index.ts has been modified to include new properties related to render functions. Lastly, a modification in server_rendering_js_code.rb initializes console.history as an empty array.

Changes

File Change Summary
node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts Updated consoleReplay and buildConsoleReplay to accept customConsoleHistory.
node_package/src/isServerRenderResult.ts Modified isPromise to accept CreateReactOutputResult, Promise<T>, string, or null.
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts Added types and functions to enhance server rendering, including validateComponent and error handling improvements.
node_package/src/types/index.ts Updated RegisteredComponent to include renderFunction and isRenderer properties.
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_js_code.rb Modified render method to initialize console.history as an empty array.

Possibly related PRs

  • Refactor serverRenderReactComponent function #1653: The changes in the serverRenderReactComponent.ts file involve significant modifications to the server rendering logic, which may interact with the consoleReplay functionality in the main PR, particularly in how console history is managed during rendering.

Suggested reviewers

  • justin808
  • alexeyr-ci

Poem

In the code where bunnies play,
A change was made to brighten the day.
With scripts anew and checks so fine,
The console's tale will brightly shine!
Hops and jumps in logic's dance,
A better flow, a joyful chance! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts (3)

16-19: Excellent change to improve robustness across different execution contexts.

The replacement of instanceof Array with Array.isArray is a great improvement. It addresses potential issues with prototype mismatches when the code runs in different execution contexts, such as within a VM for node rendering.

The updated comments provide valuable context for this change, which enhances code maintainability.

Consider adding a brief mention of why Array.isArray is preferred over instanceof Array in the comments. This could help developers who might not be familiar with the nuances of these checks. For example:

 // Must use Array.isArray instead of instanceof Array the history array is defined outside the vm if node renderer is used.
 // In this case, the Array prototype used to define the array is not the same as the one in the global scope inside the vm.
+// Array.isArray is more reliable as it works correctly even when the array is created in a different realm or execution context.

18-18: Consider removing or replacing the Flow comment

The // $FlowFixMe comment is typically used for Flow type checking, but this file appears to be using TypeScript. Consider removing this comment or replacing it with a TypeScript-specific comment if type assertion is needed.

If type assertion is needed, you could use a TypeScript assertion comment instead:

// @ts-ignore

Or, preferably, use a type assertion:

if (!Array.isArray(console.history as any[])) {

Line range hint 29-29: Consider using a more specific type for the caught error

Instead of using any for the caught error, consider using a more specific type. This will improve type safety and make the error handling more robust.

You could use the unknown type and then narrow it down:

} catch (e: unknown) {
  let errorMessage = 'An error occurred';
  if (e instanceof Error) {
    errorMessage = e.message;
  }
  val = `${errorMessage}: ${arg}`;
}

This approach provides better type safety and more informative error messages.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb9a8a2 and 0a2772f.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts (1 hunks)
  • node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-46: Summary of review

The changes made to this file improve its robustness when dealing with arrays from different execution contexts. The main functionality remains intact while addressing potential edge cases.

Key points:

  1. The switch to Array.isArray is a good improvement.
  2. The updated comments provide valuable context for the change.
  3. There are opportunities for further improvements in type safety and error handling.

Overall, this change is a step in the right direction for making the code more reliable across different environments.

node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
node_package/src/isServerRenderResult.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts (2)

14-19: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for comment improvement.

The updated function signature and comment changes look good. Accepting consoleHistory as a parameter improves flexibility and testability. The explanation for using Array.isArray is valuable.

Consider adding a brief explanation of why consoleHistory is now a parameter. For example:

 export function consoleReplay(consoleHistory: typeof console['history']): string {
-  // console.history is a global polyfill used in server rendering.
+  // consoleHistory is passed as a parameter to improve flexibility and testability.
+  // It replaces the global console.history polyfill previously used in server rendering.
   // Must use Array.isArray instead of instanceof Array the history array is defined outside the vm if node renderer is used.
   // In this case, the Array prototype used to define the array is not the same as the one in the global scope inside the vm.

44-45: Approve changes with a suggestion for JSDoc improvement.

The updates to the buildConsoleReplay function are consistent with the changes made to consoleReplay. The modification improves the flexibility of the function.

Consider adding a JSDoc comment to explain the purpose of the function and its parameter. For example:

/**
 * Builds a console replay script wrapped in script tags.
 * @param consoleHistory - The console history to be replayed.
 * @returns A string containing the console replay script wrapped in script tags.
 */
export default function buildConsoleReplay(consoleHistory: typeof console['history']): string {
  return RenderUtils.wrapInScriptTags('consoleReplayLog', consoleReplay(consoleHistory));
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71daa00 and 6d1bfca.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (1 hunks)
  • node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts (2 hunks)
  • node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts (2)

19-19: Approve the updated condition.

The change from instanceof Array to Array.isArray is correct and consistent with the updated comment. Using the consoleHistory parameter instead of console.history aligns with the function signature change.


Line range hint 1-46: Summary of changes and alignment with PR objectives.

The changes made to this file successfully contribute to the PR objective of adding support for replaying logs from async server operations. The modifications to consoleReplay and buildConsoleReplay functions improve flexibility and testability by accepting a consoleHistory parameter instead of relying on a global variable.

Key improvements:

  1. Enhanced flexibility by parameterizing consoleHistory.
  2. Improved reliability by using Array.isArray instead of instanceof Array.
  3. Updated comments explaining the rationale behind the changes.

These changes will facilitate better debugging and monitoring of async server operations by allowing more controlled log replay.

To fully complete the PR objectives, please ensure that:

  1. Tests are added or updated to cover these changes.
  2. Documentation is updated to reflect the new function signatures and usage.
  3. The CHANGELOG is updated with an entry for this feature.
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (1)

260-260: LGTM! Verify related changes and update tests/docs.

The change to pass console.history to buildConsoleReplay aligns with the PR objective of supporting log replay for async server operations. This should improve debugging capabilities.

Please ensure the following:

  1. The buildConsoleReplay function (likely in another file) has been updated to accept and use this console.history parameter.
  2. Unit tests have been updated or added to cover this change.
  3. Documentation has been updated to reflect this new functionality.

To verify the buildConsoleReplay function update, you can run:

Would you like assistance in updating the tests or documentation for this change?

node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@Judahmeek Judahmeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM. Just questions abuot minor details.

node_package/src/isServerRenderResult.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Judahmeek
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, one additional question: Can we easily test these changes?

@AbanoubGhadban AbanoubGhadban force-pushed the abanoubghadban/pro439-add-support-for-replaying-logs-happen-on-async-server-operations branch from e42d736 to 1c93b76 Compare October 13, 2024 13:28
@AbanoubGhadban AbanoubGhadban changed the base branch from master to abanoubghadban/ror1652/refactor-server-render-react-component-function October 13, 2024 13:29
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts (4)

12-12: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc for the new parameter.

The updated function signature improves flexibility by allowing a custom console history. The type and default value are appropriate.

Consider adding a JSDoc comment to describe the new customConsoleHistory parameter:

/**
 * Generates a console replay script.
 * @param customConsoleHistory Optional custom console history to use instead of the global one.
 * @returns A string containing the console replay script.
 */
export function consoleReplay(customConsoleHistory: typeof console['history'] | undefined = undefined): string {

14-16: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.

The implementation correctly uses the custom console history when provided and falls back to the global console.history otherwise. The use of the nullish coalescing operator is appropriate.

Consider adding a brief comment to explain the fallback behavior:

// Use custom history if provided, otherwise fall back to global console.history
const consoleHistory = customConsoleHistory ?? console.history;

// Ensure consoleHistory is an array before processing
if (!(Array.isArray(consoleHistory))) {
  return '';
}

47-48: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc for consistency.

The buildConsoleReplay function has been correctly updated to accept and pass the customConsoleHistory parameter to consoleReplay. This change maintains consistency with the consoleReplay function updates.

For consistency with the consoleReplay function, consider adding a JSDoc comment:

/**
 * Builds a console replay script wrapped in script tags.
 * @param customConsoleHistory Optional custom console history to use instead of the global one.
 * @returns A string containing the wrapped console replay script.
 */
export default function buildConsoleReplay(customConsoleHistory: typeof console['history'] | undefined = undefined): string {
  return RenderUtils.wrapInScriptTags('consoleReplayLog', consoleReplay(customConsoleHistory));
}

Action Required: Update buildConsoleReplay Function Calls

The following instances of buildConsoleReplay are called without the customConsoleHistory parameter:

  • node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts
  • node_package/src/types/index.ts
  • node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (2 occurrences)

Please update these calls to include the necessary customConsoleHistory parameter to ensure consistency with the new implementation.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-48: Overall implementation looks good and aligns with PR objectives.

The changes in this file successfully implement support for custom console history in both consoleReplay and buildConsoleReplay functions. This enhancement aligns well with the PR objective of adding support for replaying logs from async server operations.

A few minor suggestions for improving documentation have been made, but the core functionality appears correct and consistent. The changes maintain backward compatibility while providing the flexibility to use custom console history when needed.

To fully meet the PR objectives:

  1. Ensure that the async server operations are correctly capturing their console output in a way that can be passed to these functions.
  2. Update any calling code to utilize the new customConsoleHistory parameter when replaying logs from async operations.
  3. Add or update tests to cover these changes, as mentioned in the PR checklist.
  4. Update the documentation to reflect this new functionality.
  5. Add an entry to the CHANGELOG file describing this enhancement.

To verify the usage of these updated functions, please run the following script:

This will help ensure that any existing usage of these functions is updated to take advantage of the new customConsoleHistory parameter where appropriate.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of consoleReplay and buildConsoleReplay functions

echo "Searching for consoleReplay usage:"
rg --type typescript "consoleReplay\(" -C 3

echo "\nSearching for buildConsoleReplay usage:"
rg --type typescript "buildConsoleReplay\(" -C 3

Length of output: 338


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of consoleReplay and buildConsoleReplay functions in TypeScript files

echo "Searching for consoleReplay usage in TypeScript files:"
rg -g '*.ts' "consoleReplay\(" -C 3

echo -e "\nSearching for buildConsoleReplay usage in TypeScript files:"
rg -g '*.ts' "buildConsoleReplay\(" -C 3

Length of output: 4493


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for buildConsoleReplay calls without customConsoleHistory parameter

echo "Searching for buildConsoleReplay calls without parameters:"
rg -g '*.ts' "buildConsoleReplay\s*\(" | grep -E "buildConsoleReplay\(\s*\)"

echo -e "\nSearching for buildConsoleReplay calls with undefined parameter:"
rg -g '*.ts' "buildConsoleReplay\(undefined\)"

Length of output: 694

node_package/src/types/index.ts (1)

70-79: LGTM! Consider clarifying the relationship between renderFunction and isRenderer.

The addition of renderFunction and isRenderer properties to the RegisteredComponent interface is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objective of supporting async server operations. The detailed comments provide clear explanations of their purposes.

To further improve clarity, consider adding a note about the relationship between these two properties. For example:

// Note: All renderer functions are render functions, but not all render functions are renderer functions.
// A component can have renderFunction: true and isRenderer: false, but not vice versa.

This addition would help developers understand the hierarchy and constraints between these two properties.

node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (1)

191-191: Fix typo and improve comment clarity

There's a typo in the comment: "cleanining" should be "cleaning". Also, consider rephrasing the comment for better readability.

Apply this diff to correct the typo and enhance the comment:

-// Promises only supported in node renderer and node renderer takes care of cleanining console history
+// Promises are only supported in the Node renderer, which takes care of cleaning console history
🛑 Comments failed to post (1)
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (1)

79-81: ⚠️ Potential issue

Set hasErrors to true when promises are not supported

In the processRenderingResult function, when the result is a promise and renderingReturnsPromises is false, an error is logged in processPromise, but hasErrors remains false. To accurately reflect that an error occurred during rendering, consider setting hasErrors to true in this case.

Apply this diff to set hasErrors appropriately:

if (isPromise(result)) {
-  return { result: processPromise(result, options.renderingReturnsPromises), hasErrors: false };
+  const hasErrors = !options.renderingReturnsPromises;
+  return { result: processPromise(result, options.renderingReturnsPromises), hasErrors };
}

This will ensure that the hasErrors flag correctly indicates an issue when promises are not supported.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  if (isPromise(result)) {
    const hasErrors = !options.renderingReturnsPromises;
    return { result: processPromise(result, options.renderingReturnsPromises), hasErrors };
  }

@AbanoubGhadban AbanoubGhadban force-pushed the abanoubghadban/pro439-add-support-for-replaying-logs-happen-on-async-server-operations branch from 1c93b76 to 9ec2c20 Compare October 15, 2024 08:40
Base automatically changed from abanoubghadban/ror1652/refactor-server-render-react-component-function to master October 19, 2024 09:44
…ions

get console replay messages after promise resolves or rejects

use isPromise to check if the result is a promise

make consoleReplay function accept the list of logs to be added to the script

make consoleHistory argument of consoleReplay optional

add comments

add comments

update comment

remove FlowFixMe comment
@AbanoubGhadban AbanoubGhadban force-pushed the abanoubghadban/pro439-add-support-for-replaying-logs-happen-on-async-server-operations branch from 4c57f78 to 2697ef7 Compare October 19, 2024 12:44
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c93b76 and 2697ef7.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_js_code.rb (1 hunks)
  • node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts (2 hunks)
  • node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • node_package/src/buildConsoleReplay.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_js_code.rb (1)

43-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider enhancing the console history initialization

The addition of console.history = []; is a good step towards capturing console output during server-side rendering, which can be valuable for debugging async operations. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. This initialization occurs on every render, potentially overwriting previous logs. Consider if this is the intended behavior or if accumulating logs across renders would be more beneficial.

  2. There's no clear mechanism in the provided code to retrieve or use this history after rendering. Ensure that there's a corresponding feature to access and utilize these logs.

  3. To improve code clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this initialization, e.g.:

    // Initialize console history for capturing logs during server-side rendering
    console.history = [];

To ensure this change is properly utilized, let's verify its usage:

node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (5)

111-115: Excellent addition to preserve console logs during async operations.

This proactive approach ensures that console logs are not lost, regardless of the Node renderer's configuration. The detailed comment provides clear context, which is crucial for maintaining this code in the future.


118-118: Consistent use of captured console history.

This change ensures that all console logs, including those from async operations, are included in the replay script. It's a logical follow-up to the console history capture introduced earlier.


122-123: Consistent error handling with preserved console logs.

This change ensures that console logs are included in the replay script even when an error occurs during async operations. It maintains consistency with the success case and improves debugging capabilities in error scenarios.


134-134: Consistent update to createPromiseResult call.

This change ensures that the entire renderState is passed to createPromiseResult, maintaining consistency with the updates made to that function. It's a necessary adjustment to support the new error handling and console log preservation features.


141-141: Improved type safety with updated function signature.

The new return type null | string | Promise<RenderResult> accurately reflects the possible outcomes of the serverRenderReactComponent function. This change enhances type safety and makes the function's behavior more explicit, which will help prevent type-related errors and improve code maintainability.

}

const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Inconsistent console log handling in non-promise scenarios.

The buildConsoleReplay call here doesn't use the captured console history, unlike in the createPromiseResult function. This inconsistency may lead to loss of console logs in non-promise scenarios.

Consider updating this line to use the captured console history:

- const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay();
+ const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay(console.history);

This change would ensure consistent handling of console logs across all scenarios.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay();
const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay(console.history);

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (3)

111-124: Improved handling of console logs in async operations

The changes to the createPromiseResult function effectively address the issue of potentially losing console logs during async operations. By capturing the console history before awaiting the promise, you ensure that all logs, including those from async operations, are included in the replay script.

The added comment provides clear context for why this change was necessary, which is helpful for future maintenance.

Consider renaming consoleHistory to capturedConsoleHistory to make it even more explicit that this is a snapshot of the console history at a specific point in time:

-  const consoleHistory = console.history;
+  const capturedConsoleHistory = console.history;
   try {
     const html = await renderState.result;
-    const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay(consoleHistory);
+    const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay(capturedConsoleHistory);
     return createResultObject(html, consoleReplayScript, renderState);
   } catch (e: unknown) {
     const errorRenderState = handleRenderingError(e, { componentName, throwJsErrors });
-    const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay(consoleHistory);
+    const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay(capturedConsoleHistory);
     return createResultObject(errorRenderState.result, consoleReplayScript, renderState);
   }

Line range hint 141-187: Improved structure and clarity in serverRenderReactComponentInternal

The restructuring of the serverRenderReactComponentInternal function significantly improves its readability and clarity. The added comments provide valuable context for each step of the rendering process, which will be helpful for future maintenance and understanding of the code.

The use of newly added helper functions (validateComponent, processRenderingResult, handleRenderingError, createFinalResult) improves modularity and makes the main function more concise and focused on its primary responsibilities.

Consider adding a try-catch block around the createFinalResult call to ensure that any unexpected errors during this step are also properly handled:

   // 3. Constructs a JSON object with the following properties:
   //    - html: string | null (The rendered component HTML)
   //    - consoleReplayScript: string (Script to replay console outputs on the client)
   //    - hasErrors: boolean (Indicates if any errors occurred during rendering)
   //    - renderingError: Error | null (The error object if an error occurred, null otherwise)
   // 4. For Promise results, it awaits resolution before creating the final JSON
-  return createFinalResult(renderState, componentName, throwJsErrors);
+  try {
+    return createFinalResult(renderState, componentName, throwJsErrors);
+  } catch (e: unknown) {
+    console.error('Unexpected error during final result creation:', e);
+    return JSON.stringify(createResultObject(null, '', { hasErrors: true, error: e as Error }));
+  }

This addition ensures that any unexpected errors during the final result creation are caught and returned as a proper error response, maintaining consistency with the error handling approach used elsewhere in the function.


189-193: Improved compatibility and documentation for console history reset

The addition of comments explaining the console history reset and the conditional reset based on the rendering environment improves both the code's compatibility and its documentation. This change ensures that the console history is properly managed across different rendering scenarios.

To further improve clarity, consider slightly modifying the comments to explicitly state when the reset is necessary:

-    // This is necessary when ExecJS and old versions of node renderer are used.
-    // New versions of node renderer reset the console history automatically.
+    // This reset is necessary when using ExecJS or old versions of the node renderer.
+    // New versions of the node renderer reset the console history automatically, so this is a fallback.
     console.history = [];

This minor change makes it clearer that the reset is a fallback mechanism for specific scenarios, which could help prevent confusion for developers working with newer versions of the node renderer.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2697ef7 and 86d4262.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-110: Improved code structure and error handling

The addition of new types (RenderState and RenderOptions) and the introduction of several helper functions (validateComponent, processServerRenderHash, processPromise, processReactElement, handleRenderingError) significantly improve the code organization and readability. These changes provide better separation of concerns and standardize error handling across the module.

The validateComponent function adds a crucial safety check against using renderers directly, which could prevent potential misuse of the API.

Comment on lines +134 to 139
return createPromiseResult({ ...renderState, result }, componentName, throwJsErrors);
}

const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay();
return JSON.stringify(createResultObject(result, consoleReplayScript, renderState));
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Inconsistent console history handling in createFinalResult

The use of the spread operator in the createPromiseResult call is a good practice for maintaining immutability. However, there's an inconsistency in how the console history is handled for non-promise results.

For consistency with the promise case and to ensure all console logs are captured, consider modifying the buildConsoleReplay call for non-promise results:

-  const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay();
+  const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay(console.history);

This change ensures that all console logs are included in the replay script, regardless of whether the result is a promise or not.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
return createPromiseResult({ ...renderState, result }, componentName, throwJsErrors);
}
const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay();
return JSON.stringify(createResultObject(result, consoleReplayScript, renderState));
}
return createPromiseResult({ ...renderState, result }, componentName, throwJsErrors);
}
const consoleReplayScript = buildConsoleReplay(console.history);
return JSON.stringify(createResultObject(result, consoleReplayScript, renderState));
}

@AbanoubGhadban AbanoubGhadban merged commit eb7639b into master Oct 20, 2024
11 checks passed
@AbanoubGhadban AbanoubGhadban deleted the abanoubghadban/pro439-add-support-for-replaying-logs-happen-on-async-server-operations branch October 20, 2024 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants