initial commit for this **EXPERIMENTAL** branch

[kporangehat]

Not for merging. just for review.

Adds ShotgunMulti object which inherits from Shotgun and is returned when setting the multi_thread=True parameter when instantiating Shotgun. This object uses the requests module instead of httplib2/urllib.
Adds callbacks to the upload() and download_attachment() methods which receive a ShotgunProgressMonitor object for use when handling progress info.
More to come.

[manneohrstrom]

This is exciting! @sgsteph should watch this space :)

[sgsteph]

I definetely do ;)

Stéphane Deverly

Le 5 nov. 2015 à 22:21, Manne Öhrström [email protected] a écrit :

This is exciting! @sgsteph should watch this space :)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[kporangehat]

heh... lots of this is about to change :). Moving away from the subclassing and going to make this much more independent. Updates coming hopefully very soon!

[cmihaly]

Very exciting to see these changes! Chris

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 5, 2015, at 10:25 PM, KP [email protected] wrote:

heh... lots of this is about to change :). Moving away from the subclassing and going to make this much more independent. Updates coming hopefully very soon!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[sgsteph]

A quick heads up that I had issues with requests.get and https://sg-media-usor-01.s3.amazonaws.com urls and ended up having verify=False for my download requests. By default, verify is True I think.

[kporangehat]

@sgsteph interesting. I did not run into any issues on my end. Were the issues simply verification failures or something else?

[monkeydev]

The error was :
Error reported: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:590)
I didn’t have the issue on my laptop but on remote servers where I deployed a service.

On 06 Nov 2015, at 18:18, KP [email protected] wrote:

@sgsteph https://github.com/sgsteph interesting. I did not run into any issues on my end. Were the issues simply verification failures or something else?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #93 (comment).