Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve log poller codec usage #1014

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: NONEVM-916-logpoller-process-decode
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Improve log poller codec usage #1014

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

ilija42
Copy link
Contributor

@ilija42 ilija42 commented Jan 14, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Description

Init codec through NewCodec which resolves discriminators automatically on Decode

@ilija42 ilija42 requested review from a team as code owners January 14, 2025 18:23
@ilija42 ilija42 requested review from reductionista and EasterTheBunny and removed request for a team and reductionista January 14, 2025 18:23
@ilija42 ilija42 force-pushed the improve-lp-codec-usage branch 2 times, most recently from a3ad8c0 to 577d1be Compare January 14, 2025 18:34
@ilija42 ilija42 requested a review from reductionista January 14, 2025 18:37
@ilija42 ilija42 mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Open
@ilija42 ilija42 force-pushed the improve-lp-codec-usage branch from 0c844c5 to e0d05b3 Compare January 14, 2025 19:28
@ilija42 ilija42 force-pushed the improve-lp-codec-usage branch from e0d05b3 to 3e58e35 Compare January 14, 2025 19:32
@ilija42 ilija42 force-pushed the improve-lp-codec-usage branch from b86066c to d8eee27 Compare January 16, 2025 11:47
@ilija42 ilija42 force-pushed the improve-lp-codec-usage branch from 84114ae to e538b0b Compare January 16, 2025 22:41
@ilija42 ilija42 force-pushed the improve-lp-codec-usage branch from e538b0b to 324aa33 Compare January 17, 2025 20:45
@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

Quality Gate failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 75%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@EasterTheBunny EasterTheBunny EasterTheBunny approved these changes

@reductionista reductionista Awaiting requested review from reductionista

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ilija42 @EasterTheBunny