Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: only consider specified packages when stopping because of downgrading #65

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor

@johanneskoester johanneskoester commented Oct 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error messaging when package downgrades are detected during environment updates.
    • Enhanced logic for identifying downgraded packages to ensure accuracy.
  • Chores

    • Refined internal processes for managing package dependencies without altering public interfaces.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the CondaEnvProcessor class, specifically modifying the update_env method. The method's logic for identifying downgraded packages has been refined to utilize set intersection, ensuring that only packages that are both unconstrained and subject to downgrade are included. Additionally, the error message for downgrade detection has been updated to provide clearer feedback regarding environment update failures. The overall structure of the method remains unchanged, and no public interfaces or signatures have been altered.

Changes

File Change Summary
snakedeploy/conda.py Modified update_env method in CondaEnvProcessor to use set intersection for downgraded packages and updated the corresponding error message. Simplified SHA retrieval logic in create method of PR class.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CondaEnvProcessor
    participant DowngradedChecker

    User->>CondaEnvProcessor: Request to update environment
    CondaEnvProcessor->>DowngradedChecker: Check for downgraded packages
    DowngradedChecker-->>CondaEnvProcessor: Return downgraded packages
    CondaEnvProcessor->>CondaEnvProcessor: Determine unconstrained packages
    CondaEnvProcessor->>CondaEnvProcessor: Compute set intersection for downgraded packages
    CondaEnvProcessor->>User: Return error if downgrades detected
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc52da4 and 71c011c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • snakedeploy/conda.py (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • snakedeploy/conda.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
snakedeploy/conda.py (1)

Line range hint 225-231: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for clarity.

The changes look good and improve the accuracy of detecting downgraded packages. The new implementation ensures that only unconstrained dependencies that would be downgraded are considered, which should reduce false positives.

Consider renaming the downgraded variable to downgraded_unconstrained_deps for clarity, as it now represents the intersection of unconstrained dependencies and those that would be downgraded. This would make the variable's purpose more explicit:

downgraded_unconstrained_deps = set(unconstrained_deps) & set(downgraded())
if downgraded_unconstrained_deps:
    msg = (
        f"Env {conda_env_path} could not be updated because the following packages "
        f"would be downgraded: {', '.join(downgraded_unconstrained_deps)}. Please consider a manual update "
        "of the environment."
    )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d33541a and cc52da4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • snakedeploy/conda.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
snakedeploy/conda.py (1)

Pattern **/*.py: Do not try to improve formatting.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.
Do not suggest return type annotation if a function or method does not contain a return statement.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
snakedeploy/conda.py (1)

Line range hint 1-431: Overall assessment of changes

The changes in this file effectively address the PR objective of only considering specified packages when stopping because of downgrading. The modification to the update_env method improves the accuracy of detecting downgraded packages by considering only unconstrained dependencies. This should reduce false positives and provide clearer feedback to users when environment updates fail due to package downgrades.

The implementation is consistent with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. No other significant changes were made to the file, and the overall structure and logic of the CondaEnvProcessor class remain intact.

@johanneskoester johanneskoester merged commit 2aa3f82 into main Oct 9, 2024
6 checks passed
@johanneskoester johanneskoester deleted the fix/downgraded-determination branch October 9, 2024 20:46
johanneskoester pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2024
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\*
---
###
[0.10.1](https://www.github.com/snakemake/snakedeploy/compare/v0.10.0...v0.10.1)
(2024-10-09)


### Bug Fixes

* only consider specified packages when stopping because of downgrading
([#65](https://www.github.com/snakemake/snakedeploy/issues/65))
([2aa3f82](https://www.github.com/snakemake/snakedeploy/commit/2aa3f82bb44b91dd6288f88226ffdac28d4fcf78))
---


This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant