Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Typo, Improve Readability, and Enhance Token Extension Handling #471

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

kilavvy
Copy link
Contributor

@kilavvy kilavvy commented Feb 26, 2025

This pull request includes the following changes:

  • Fixed a typo: Corrected "procesisg" to "processing" in test descriptions.
  • Improved readability: Adjusted comment formatting in parseFeatureAccount.ts.
  • Enhanced token extension handling: Updated unparseableExtension naming for consistency in token-extension.ts.

These changes improve code clarity, maintainability, and ensure better developer experience.


Important

Fixes typos, improves readability, and renames unparseableExtension to unparsableExtension for consistency.

  • Token Extension Handling:
    • Renamed unparseableExtension to unparsableExtension in token-extension.ts for consistency.
  • Typo Fixes:
    • Corrected "procesisg" to "processing" in endpoint.test.ts.
    • Corrected "unkonwn" to "unknown" in anchor.tsx.
  • Readability Improvements:
    • Adjusted comment formatting in parseFeatureAccount.ts.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 9e195d3. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 26, 2025

@kilavvy is attempting to deploy a commit to the Solana Foundation Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 9e195d3 in 35 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 51 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 10 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. app/api/metadata/proxy/__tests__/endpoint.test.ts:75
  • Draft comment:
    Fixed typo in test description.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It simply states that a typo was fixed, which does not align with the rules provided.
2. app/utils/anchor.tsx:503
  • Draft comment:
    Corrected typo: 'unkonwn' -> 'unknown'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is purely informative as it only points out a typo correction. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
3. app/utils/parseFeatureAccount.ts:18
  • Draft comment:
    Fixed typo in comment: 'retreive' to 'retrieve'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is purely informative as it only points out a typo correction in a comment, which doesn't affect the functionality of the code. It doesn't provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
4. app/validators/accounts/token-extension.ts:29
  • Draft comment:
    Renamed 'unparseableExtension' to 'unparsableExtension' for consistency.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is purely informative, as it only states that a variable was renamed for consistency. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
5. app/api/metadata/proxy/__tests__/endpoint.test.ts:75
  • Draft comment:
    Typo fixed: 'procesisg' updated to 'processing' for clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
    None
6. app/utils/anchor.tsx:503
  • Draft comment:
    Corrected typo: changed 'unkonwn' to 'unknown'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
    None
7. app/utils/parseFeatureAccount.ts:18
  • Draft comment:
    Improved comment: 'retreive' corrected to 'retrieve'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
    None
8. app/validators/accounts/token-extension.ts:29
  • Draft comment:
    Renamed enum value to 'unparsableExtension' for consistency.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
    None
9. app/utils/anchor.tsx:503
  • Draft comment:
    The typo "unkonwn" has been corrected to "unknown". Please double-check for any similar issues in case the mistake might recur elsewhere.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is asking the PR author to double-check for similar issues, which violates the rule against asking the author to double-check things. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.
10. app/validators/accounts/token-extension.ts:29
  • Draft comment:
    The enum identifier has been corrected from 'unparseableExtension' to 'unparsableExtension'. This is a trivial typo fix but ensures consistency in the codebase.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is purely informative, as it only describes a change that was made without suggesting any action or improvement. It doesn't ask for confirmation or suggest any specific code changes. According to the rules, purely informative comments should be removed.

Workflow ID: wflow_JMhY9jXITM2xBaRp


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@ngundotra
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for this! Looks good to me

@ngundotra ngundotra merged commit d68f9b2 into solana-foundation:master Feb 27, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants