Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "Inactive Account Have Activity Detected" #3160

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zake1god
Copy link

Details

This PR introduces a new detection for Inactive User Have Activity Detected. This detection identifies users who have been inactive for more than 30 days and suddenly have activity based on network traffic logs.

Screenshots/Examples :
Exampleszs


Checklist

  • Validate name matches <platform>_<mitre att&ck technique>_<short description> nomenclature
  • CI/CD jobs passed ✔️
  • Validated SPL logic.
  • Validated tags, description, and how to implement.
  • Verified references match analytic.
  • Confirm updates to lookups are handled properly.

Notes For Submitters and Reviewers

  • If you're submitting a PR from a fork, ensuring the box to allow updates from maintainers is checked will help speed up the process of getting it merged.
  • Checking the output of the build CI job when it fails will likely show an error about what is failing. You may have a very descriptive error of the specific field(s) in the specific file(s) that is causing an issue. In some cases, it's also possible there is an issue with the YAML. Many of these can be caught with the pre-commit hooks if you set them up. These errors will be less descriptive as to what exactly is wrong but will give you a column and row position in a specific file where the YAML processing breaks. If you're having trouble with this, feel free to add a comment to your PR tagging one of the maintainers, and we'll be happy to help troubleshoot it.
  • Updates to existing lookup files can be tricky because of how Splunk handles application updates and the differences between existing lookup files being updated vs new lookups. You can read more here, but the short version is that any changes to lookup files need to bump the datestamp in the lookup CSV filename, and the reference to it in the YAML needs to be updated.

@zake1god zake1god changed the title Add "Inactive User Have Activity Detected" Add "Inactive Account Have Activity Detected" Oct 15, 2024
@zake1god
Copy link
Author

Detection Metadata Validation:
❌ ESCU - Detect Risky SPL using Pretrained ML Model - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Path traversal SPL injection - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Persistent XSS in RapidDiag through User Interface Views - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Splunk Absolute Path Traversal Using runshellscript - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Splunk Account Discovery Drilldown Dashboard Disclosure - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Splunk App for Lookup File Editing RCE via User XSLT - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Splunk Authentication Token Exposure in Debug Log - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Splunk Code Injection via custom dashboard leading to RCE - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Delete Usage - Rule
🔸 Detection from previous build not found in current build.
❌ ESCU - Splunk Command and Scripting Interpreter Risky Commands - Rule

Somebody can help me to fix this issue ? @patel-bhavin @ljstella 

@ljstella
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @zake1god - as I mentioned in the other PR, those errors will appear until we merge #3149 - There are also possibly going to be errors as we merge other PRs and have updated our contentctl tooling this morning. We will work with you to get these all cleaned up just as soon as we can.

@patel-bhavin
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, like @ljstella mentioned - we are working on getting tooling and git actions a bit straightened out. We will keep you updated! and thank you contributing to security_content!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants